The Following User Says Thank You to Flandry For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-01
, 08:42
|
|
Posts: 102 |
Thanked: 153 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#42
|
but id like to say tht if the settings are reverted on every call...thn it makes it a little unusable.
coz u cnt set it again and again after every call!
The Following User Says Thank You to direx For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-01
, 09:03
|
Posts: 219 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#43
|
Battery Graph showed higher consumption using Ideal settings?
FYI the general consensus about 125 MHz is that it actually reduces battery life with well-behaved applications due to the slower race-to-idle (presumably why Nokia didn't use it).
The best explanation that fits with both of your observations is that you have something installed and running that doesn't let the processor sleep much (see e.g. http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=29284). Have you got some kind of CPU load monitor running to check for the culprit?
![]() |
2010-07-01
, 09:10
|
Posts: 219 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#44
|
Flandry
Regularly checking Conky (if that's reliable enough ?) showed no rogue processes running.
No placebo either - I was surprised (given how happy many people have been with power kernel) but both Battery Eye and the DCEW showing output of lshal pointed to my battery dropping off a cliff on Ideal. No reboots though.
And my battery life on day 2 of QCPUFreq alone is noticeably, actually measurably better ( 68% now after 12 hours use, as opposed to 40 odd percent on stock and 30 odd percent on ideal ) .
I can't explain it, but there.
Overall my little N900 has been exceptionally well-behaved on both software and hardware fronts. I'm quite content to sit back and enjoy my newfound lease on battery life for now
![]() |
2010-07-01
, 12:19
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 59 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#45
|
![]() |
2010-07-01
, 17:31
|
Posts: 219 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#46
|
![]() |
2010-07-01
, 18:25
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 59 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#47
|
![]() |
2010-07-01
, 18:31
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#48
|
![]() |
2010-07-02
, 07:18
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 59 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#49
|
![]() |
2010-07-02
, 09:12
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#50
|
Thanks for the info; it's strange, all right. I've not really seen a change for better or worse on power kernel so i'm just leaving it be for now.
Unofficial PR1.3/Meego 1.1 FAQ
Accelemymote: make your accelerometer more joy-ful