![]() |
2010-07-27
, 10:19
|
Posts: 427 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#2
|
![]() |
2010-07-27
, 11:07
|
|
Posts: 353 |
Thanked: 166 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ India
|
#3
|
![]() |
2010-07-27
, 11:18
|
|
Posts: 1,091 |
Thanked: 323 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ ~
|
#4
|
![]() |
2010-07-27
, 11:31
|
|
Posts: 466 |
Thanked: 180 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#5
|
![]() |
2010-07-27
, 11:36
|
|
Posts: 353 |
Thanked: 166 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ India
|
#6
|
![]() |
2010-07-27
, 18:05
|
|
Posts: 3,404 |
Thanked: 4,474 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Germany
|
#7
|
Hi guys.
Well the question is simple... i am using Flac on my N900.. i know that Flac = More Cpu usage = less battery..but the load applet shows very less Cpu usage....is that correct?
PS : I love the FLAC support on N900..just love it!
sorry if this is a lame question..but i always wondered flac kills the processor and all
![]() |
2010-07-27
, 18:14
|
|
Posts: 353 |
Thanked: 166 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ India
|
#9
|
FLAC is lossless compression and much lighter on the CPU than the algorithms used for decompressing lossy compressed audio. There's not so much fancy maths involved.
Well the question is simple... i am using Flac on my N900.. i know that Flac = More Cpu usage = less battery..but the load applet shows very less Cpu usage....is that correct?
PS : I love the FLAC support on N900..just love it!
sorry if this is a lame question..but i always wondered flac kills the processor and all