|
2010-08-13
, 05:12
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#122
|
Pure conjecture at this point, but I imagine it'll be the same story as usual. They won't mind their binaries on their own hardware.
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-08-13
, 05:47
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#123
|
The Following User Says Thank You to fatalsaint For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-08-13
, 17:49
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#124
|
I agree with dan here. MeeGo the core OS with reference framework should most certainly be possible to get on the Samsung now that those drivers are open. Ganted youd have to figure out to flash it..
Right now the only closed components in MeeGo for the N900 is completely N900 specific.. drivers and modules just for this device.
Now.. getting Nokias other proprietary stuff that they plan to add in the future to MeeGo probably not.. But that's not part of the MeeGo core.. thats Nokia specific stuff. A community could add its own components to MeeGo to compensate.
![]() |
2010-08-13
, 18:11
|
Posts: 1,096 |
Thanked: 760 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#125
|
And that's exactly the point I was making... getting MeeGo on another device (Samsung's Captivate, for example) would be a HUGE win... and, HELL, if it works smoothly maybe we can even convince Samsung to bless it and design handsets and tablets around MeeGo instead of Android.
I can only imagine Samsung would be a VASTLY better company to deal with than Nokia. Especially if they seem to have more pull with component manufacturers as they're proving that they do with this vastly more earnest push for open-sourcing than Nokia ever did for us. And especially still, if they grok open-source.. I mean TRULY grok it, unlike Nokia.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to quipper8 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-08-13
, 18:13
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#126
|
I don't see any reason why samsung would NOT pick up Meego and put a phone out with it. they obviously do not have any hangups about putting out phones with WinMo, BADA, android.
Also, Sasmung has pull with manufacturers because in many many cases they ARE the manufacturer
![]() |
2010-08-13
, 19:26
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#127
|
![]() |
2010-08-13
, 21:07
|
|
Posts: 876 |
Thanked: 396 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#128
|
![]() |
2010-08-13
, 21:20
|
|
Posts: 1,716 |
Thanked: 3,007 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#129
|
![]() |
2010-08-13
, 21:35
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#130
|
The Following User Says Thank You to fatalsaint For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
2nokia, android, face palm, opensource |
|
So I don't imagine they'd have problems with people hacking at newer Nokia-specific MeeGo bits to run on N900 MeeGo, for instance.
i'm a Qt expert and former Jolla sailor (forever sailing, in spirit).
if you like, read more about me.
if you find me entertaining, or useful, thank me. if you don't, then tell me why.