The Following User Says Thank You to ossipena For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-03
, 06:56
|
|
Posts: 1,885 |
Thanked: 2,008 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ OVI MAPS
|
#52
|
what makes you say that? please see my post above. I am so kind that I am willing to give you the direct link because I cannot be certain you can find it at all:
http://webcast.nokia.com/CCUIv3/fram...lash-video-500
![]() |
2010-09-03
, 07:19
|
Posts: 1,751 |
Thanked: 844 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Sweden
|
#53
|
ya exactly. People need to read that i only posted this as an idea for Nokia to *possibly* promote the N900 in terms of sales and its users, rather just an experimental device. The N900 lacks apps and games in general, and could still use some of the decent symbian apps if it were to be able to run symbian somehow.
Sure the symbian is a crappy OS, but it's still being used by Nokia. If i'm not wrong, the upcoming N9 will be supporting symbian, correct?? So why not let N900 run it as well? I can't imagine why some of u are always this negative on the community and attempt to flame or share only negativity upon any suggestion or idea posted by the OP, and yes i'm looking at you "atilla", u manage to spam 2 of my topics already, if ur this bored go get a life and stop posting useless comments in my topic or at anyone's topic.
Anyway, people port Android to the N900, as well as on the iPhone and other Windows Mobile devices and we all like this. And yet i suggest a possibility for Nokia to implement Symbian, which is their own proprietary software, and some of u guys think it's a stupid idea and fail in general?? We'll be able to get more usage out of the phone, whether the symbian is a crappy os or not or whether the apps sucks or not, as long as we get to use additional features and options then it's always a plus. It's *OPTIONAL* for u to use it or not.
It wouldn't be hard for Nokia to implement that since Symbian IS Nokia after all. What are the downsides to this anyway?? I can't imagine there being any.
Lastly, i read a while ago that Nokia still wants to improve Symbian as they'll be releasing Symbian 3 or something. They could still use the N900 as a test device so why not?
And yes, aside from a few hardware differences between the N900 and N97, the main biggest difference is the OS.
![]() |
2010-09-03
, 08:46
|
Posts: 1,048 |
Thanked: 1,127 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Amsterdam
|
#54
|
what makes you say that? please see my post above. I am so kind that I am willing to give you the direct link because I cannot be certain you can find it at all:
http://webcast.nokia.com/CCUIv3/fram...lash-video-500
The Following User Says Thank You to anthonie For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-03
, 08:46
|
|
Posts: 741 |
Thanked: 900 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Auckland NZ
|
#55
|
The Following User Says Thank You to maluka For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-03
, 08:49
|
Posts: 112 |
Thanked: 24 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ New Zealand
|
#56
|
the biggest problem is that you weren't here when the information were available and amongst active topics.
ever heard about wikipedia?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N900
(hint: look at the sources)
there is a simple reason why step 4 thing isn't mentioned in the marketing places (this is where "research before you buy" derives...)
You ask about confirmation regarding a high-end Nokia device? A Nokia device? Perhaps you could show us your sources or the N9 specs running Symbian? Untill the device comes out, id est, is officially announced any conversation will be speculation.
I havenīt been up to date either, but a quick glance over at the Wiki page taught me itīs open source since februari 2010.
I canīt help but wondering, after reading this thread and your comments, what you yourself are able and willing to contribute to such a project as porting Symbian to the N900. You talk about "we", yet you get angry at anyone who gives a bit of opposition to your expressed ideas. If there is such a thing as "we", regarding this particular idea of yours, how come you seem to have so much trouble taking a bit of criticism? I suppose you are aware that a lot of people who own the N900 are higher than average tech-savy people that tend to be fairly critical at any technology being thrown at them. Thatīs how they became tech-savy... So I guess my question(s) would boil down to this: what kind of road map do you have, in terms of specs and requirements and how are you going to win people over to this project in order to help you?
If you wasn't so up thight.. you would realise that it's you who start all the flaming. This time you ask for peoples opinions.. and when they give you it.. you take it as flame because they don't agree with you?!? Get a life dude...
![]() |
2010-09-03
, 09:12
|
|
Posts: 1,411 |
Thanked: 1,330 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Tatooine
|
#57
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jedi For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-03
, 09:15
|
Posts: 112 |
Thanked: 24 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ New Zealand
|
#58
|
That's odd - a couple of days ago you said you'd added atilla to your ignore list - why'd you un-ignore him if he's causing you so much offence?
And seriously dude, take a chill pill and find out what a spammer is.
![]() |
2010-09-03
, 10:00
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#59
|
not everyone checks Wikipedia and it's not fully accurate anyway. I mean, the guy's point was that it should've and would've been Nokia to put up this critical information and not rely on Wikipedia to inform the users. It's kinda the wrong way round, dun u think?
![]() |
2010-09-03
, 10:05
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#60
|
http://webcast.nokia.com/CCUIv3/fram...lash-video-500
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search