![]() |
2010-12-03
, 01:06
|
|
Posts: 1,338 |
Thanked: 1,055 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ California, USA / Jordan
|
#2
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to bandora For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-12-03
, 06:30
|
|
Posts: 1,839 |
Thanked: 2,432 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#3
|
![]() |
2010-12-03
, 06:53
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#4
|
It looks like the project is chacky as hell. its over a month ago the handset developers wanted to break compability from 1.1 and 1.2 cause of lack of hardfp support in gcc arm toolchhain. I would agree on this change cause better break now than break when there is products released. But again its over a month and the proposal seems still to be pending?
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-12-03
, 06:55
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#5
|
![]() |
2010-12-03
, 08:21
|
Posts: 152 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Shanghai, China
|
#6
|
No, the problem wasn't the lack of support - the problem was that we had to do a ABI break in order to get significant performance benefits along with alignment to other efforts at Linaro.
![]() |
2010-12-03
, 10:46
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 738 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Low Earth Orbit
|
#7
|
The Following User Says Thank You to kureyon For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-12-03
, 10:51
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#8
|
![]() |
2010-12-03
, 22:38
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#9
|
No, the problem wasn't the lack of support - the problem was that we had to do a ABI break in order to get significant performance benefits along with alignment to other efforts at Linaro.
And such a thing isn't taken lightly - I personally don't like we had to do a break but it's now or never.
It's no longer pending. The proposal reached the top after long discussions in various areas including ARM vendors (we've spoken to TI, ST-Ericsson, Qualcomm, Marvell, nVidia, Broadcom) and was agreed upon at the TSG meeting on Wednesday.
Yours truly actually spent a week re-porting MeeGo to ARMv7 hardfp (from a Debian hardfp base), so the technical side is ready. As well as someone else doing the actual build integration.
The kind of break we're doing, X86 wish they could do too, but can't because of all the binaries strayed around. It's about passing floating point values in fast hardware floating point registers instead of slow integer registers. The problem is that this is entirely historical, from when ARM devices didn't have a FPU, people chose the widest compatibility. For ARMv7, this is pretty guaranteed..
![]() |
2010-12-03
, 22:50
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#10
|
What exactly is a "business" phone in the first place? For my needs a decent IMAP client would be enough, but the N900 already has MS-back-end stuff for those that need it.
I just start too wonder for real if nokia believe in Meego project. Thhey still lobbying most the time about how good symbian is...
To mee it looks like Meego is a hobbyproject for nokia.
It looks like the project is chacky as hell. its over a month ago the handset developers wanted to break compability from 1.1 and 1.2 cause of lack of hardfp support in gcc arm toolchhain. I would agree on this change cause better break now than break when there is products released. But again its over a month and the proposal seems still to be pending? This is infact one of the drawbacks with openess. not all is good with full openess and I begining to think that merge of mobil maemo was a mistake. I mean Intel people has no intrests in arm. and what will Intel contribute for nokia. It seems it was only cause Nokia wanted QT in moblin but as far as I know meego notebook is still Gtk+. So what has this merge given so far?? not much..
the future will give us answer... I really hope Nokia will release a N900 killer nextyear cause right now there is NO computerphone that can replace it. As I have said before N8 is a downgrade not a chance I would replace my n900 with N8.....
Last edited by mikecomputing; 2010-12-03 at 01:06.