![]() |
2010-12-06
, 09:41
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#2
|
![]() |
2010-12-06
, 22:54
|
Posts: 28 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#3
|
![]() |
2010-12-07
, 09:02
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#4
|
Thanks for the info, I just wish there was a more complete Exchange solution.
I was wondering about the possibility of porting functionality over from Evolution's Exchange connector, but I haven't even been able to get Exchange running on my Linux machine when I tried the other night. If it's not Microsoft, it seems like it's hard to get it working with Exchange haha...
![]() |
2010-12-07
, 18:02
|
Posts: 28 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#5
|
![]() |
2010-12-08
, 09:01
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#6
|
I was more so thinking along the lines of seeing if we could obtain Exchange connectivity from a PC perspective, rather than a mobile device perspective.
For example, I don't know if Microsoft Outlook has any concept of provisioning, because it doesn't run on a mobile device. And in the same way, I might expect Evolution to act the same.
However, how does one know if their company's Exchange server requires provisioning?
In trying to setup my N900, I get the to the typical first synchronisation step, but then it fails reporting an error in communication.
The interesting thing though is that when I log into the web interface of my company's Exchange server, if I go to the Mobile devices section, I can see that there is a new mobile device added with the same ID as my N900. The status there reports the first time I tried to sync this device, and reports an "OK" status. But clearly it's not ok...
I enabled logging and checked the log for when my N900 tries to connect. Essentially, I'm getting back a 403 error, saying that I don't have permission to view this directory or page using the credentials that I supplied.
I don't know if this is due to provisioning or something else. In one of the earlier HTTP interactions (before trying to sync), I can see that the Exchange server rports this back:
At any rate, I can proceed further and the actual request to perform a sync, the error response is:
Does activesync do an authenticate step earlier somewhere? I don't remember seeing it? Does anyone have any thoughts or any tips as to what to hunt for in the logs?