![]() |
2010-12-28
, 15:08
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#122
|
Nokia does not have the recourses or manpower to do this, Nokia needs someone further "upstream" to maintain the core OS.
Regarding MeeGo for ARM, Nokia has to do everything alone, but still they are 100% dependent on the Linux kernel further upstream.
Google said: Lets branch off from the bloated Linux kernel, cut of the dead meat and make a true mobile OS that we have full control of.
Nokia has Symbian that has nothing in common with the bloatware Linux kernel.
The way it is right now, Intel maintain the Intel version of MeeGo while Nokia maintain the ARM version.
It would be much easier and sober (Nokia is no producer of ARM chips) for Nokia to do what everybody else will do; use the Intel-MeeGo on intel chips - plug'n play - ready to put some fancy UI on it. Symbian works perfectly for ARM, why duplicate the work?
For Nokia, going Intel on MeeGo would make sense. Going WM as core OS would also make sense.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-12-28
, 15:44
|
Banned |
Posts: 974 |
Thanked: 622 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#123
|
It's not that they don't have the manpower or resources, obviously they do. The point is that doing a whole OS like Maemo is outside Nokia's scope.
Which only really needs to be done once then maintained in the upstream. It is an investment, but not whole-OS level and will pay out over time.
No they didn't. They bought a company developing a proprietary OS that used a heavily augmented Linux kernel and open sourced it. They then reinvented the wheel and threw away the rest of the open source community.
You are very, very anti-Linux and have yet to see a real basis for it.
Well, that shouldn't be too hard, so long as the code doesn't do stupid CPU specific stuff and the compiler works well. Integration as a whole is done on a higher level and optimization is device specific.
Because now only Nokia is developing Symbian, and must do even more than they did with Maemo.
Nonsense. That cleaves your branding in half and gives the mobile space securely to Microsoft, since Intel won't be relevant in smartphones for a while.
![]() |
2010-12-28
, 16:09
|
|
Posts: 402 |
Thanked: 451 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ India
|
#124
|
Google has shown how to do this the right way with Android.
Nokia has shown how to do this the wrong way with Maemo/MeeGo.
Intel is into MeeGo to sell more chips, why is Nokia there?
There is too much here that makes no sense.
The Following User Says Thank You to vkv.raju For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-12-28
, 16:19
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#125
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-12-28
, 21:15
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#127
|
Bada is about to come out with version 2.0 whereas I never saw 1.0. Not a good sign.
|
2010-12-28
, 22:40
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#128
|
Myself, I hadn't ever HEARD of Bada until someone mentioned it here sometime last year as an example of an open-source OS... which, as it turns out, it is not. Soooooo... what was the point being made here now, again?
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-12-28
, 23:11
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#129
|
I understood what he meant. Upstream is a relative term in any case, but the problem is that he (and you as well by the looks of it) have not understood Nokia's main problem. Nokia does not have the recourses or manpower to do this, Nokia needs someone further "upstream" to maintain the core OS. Regarding MeeGo for ARM, Nokia has to do everything alone, but still they are 100% dependent on the Linux kernel further upstream.
Google said: Lets branch off from the bloated Linux kernel, cut of the dead meat and make a true mobile OS that we have full control of. I don't blame them, it's their OS, and only Google knows what is best for Google. Nokia don't need to do this. Nokia has Symbian that has nothing in common with the bloatware Linux kernel. The way it is right now, Intel maintain the Intel version of MeeGo while Nokia maintain the ARM version. It would be much easier and sober (Nokia is no producer of ARM chips) for Nokia to do what everybody else will do; use the Intel-MeeGo on intel chips - plug'n play - ready to put some fancy UI on it. Symbian works perfectly for ARM, why duplicate the work?
For Nokia, going Intel on MeeGo would make sense. Going WM as core OS would also make sense.
![]() |
2010-12-28
, 23:42
|
Posts: 671 |
Thanked: 1,630 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#130
|
You say Intel in Nokia handsets? I say no thanks. I dont want to have a fan in my handset cause the cpu is eating to much power!! It will take two years more before even Intel has a chance on the handset market.
![]() |
Tags |
armageddon, circle jerk, going down, horoscope, internet eldars, mental jerk off, nokia of borg, phone different, rumors, unfounded |
|
Google said: Lets branch off from the bloated Linux kernel, cut of the dead meat and make a true mobile OS that we have full control of. I don't blame them, it's their OS, and only Google knows what is best for Google. Nokia don't need to do this. Nokia has Symbian that has nothing in common with the bloatware Linux kernel. The way it is right now, Intel maintain the Intel version of MeeGo while Nokia maintain the ARM version. It would be much easier and sober (Nokia is no producer of ARM chips) for Nokia to do what everybody else will do; use the Intel-MeeGo on intel chips - plug'n play - ready to put some fancy UI on it. Symbian works perfectly for ARM, why duplicate the work?
For Nokia, going Intel on MeeGo would make sense. Going WM as core OS would also make sense.