![]() |
2011-02-02
, 06:20
|
Posts: 1,425 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Hong Kong
|
#11
|
![]() |
2011-02-02
, 06:37
|
Posts: 2,225 |
Thanked: 3,822 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Florida
|
#12
|
![]() |
2011-02-02
, 06:39
|
Posts: 1,425 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Hong Kong
|
#13
|
![]() |
2011-02-02
, 06:59
|
Posts: 1,463 |
Thanked: 1,916 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Edmonton, AB
|
#14
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Creamy Goodness For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-02-02
, 07:34
|
Posts: 39 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Stockholm
|
#15
|
![]() |
2011-02-02
, 14:14
|
|
Posts: 1,411 |
Thanked: 1,330 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Tatooine
|
#16
|
woldnt it be better to skip the whole flash thing and focus on html5 which is around the corner and many are converting to. I hardly think that youtube (google) wants to be in the hands of Adobe if they neednt.
![]() |
2011-02-02
, 14:18
|
Posts: 411 |
Thanked: 195 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#17
|
woldnt it be better to skip the whole flash thing and focus on html5 which is around the corner and many are converting to. I hardly think that youtube (google) wants to be in the hands of Adobe if they neednt.
![]() |
2011-02-02
, 14:53
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#18
|
![]() |
2011-02-02
, 19:44
|
|
Posts: 1,411 |
Thanked: 1,330 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Tatooine
|
#19
|
And why would it have to be ? The argument is actually about legacy systems/developers, not what HTML5 or any other tech can(not) do.