![]() |
2011-02-08
, 16:13
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#82
|
![]() |
2011-02-08
, 16:19
|
Posts: 323 |
Thanked: 116 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#83
|
![]() |
2011-02-08
, 16:19
|
|
Posts: 733 |
Thanked: 991 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#84
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mrojas For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-02-08
, 16:29
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#85
|
Applications use more memory with Dalvik than without.
The performance of maemo is better.
![]() |
2011-02-08
, 16:31
|
|
Posts: 741 |
Thanked: 900 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Auckland NZ
|
#86
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to maluka For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-02-08
, 16:43
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#87
|
If MeeGo comes with the same free OVI Maps as Symbian then I can see someone choosing free offline satnav over an Android phone that only has online nav. When you travel outside your country's borders a lot, free offline nav becomes a big deal.
![]() |
2011-02-08
, 17:07
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#88
|
Now this is interesting:
"Most Android applications can run unmodified as
the vast majority of Android APIs are supported and
tight integration with the QT framework leads to a
seamless user experience."
They use Qt as backend.
![]() |
2011-02-08
, 17:21
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#89
|
As a former OS/2 user who saw developers use Windows support as an excuse to not making native OS/2 applications, and users who realized there was no point in using OS/2 if all the apps they used were Windows apps, please excuse me if I refrain from celebrating and sit back and watch with a skeptical eye...
![]() |
2011-02-08
, 17:38
|
Posts: 194 |
Thanked: 87 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#90
|
![]() |
Tags |
2014 no dalvik, android, dalvik, its christmas!, java vm, just shoot me, maemo, meegdroid, meego |
|
OS/2 died because of the bad marketing and the bad performance.
They didn't have ENOUGH applications for the normal user.
When they begun to use Windows Applications it was already to late.
Many hated Microsoft and were willing to swith to OS/2.
But the gas machine of IBM wasn't flexible enough for user needs.