|
2011-02-11
, 17:45
|
Posts: 345 |
Thanked: 117 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ uk
|
#1132
|
|
2011-02-11
, 17:53
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#1133
|
|
2011-02-11
, 18:16
|
Posts: 96 |
Thanked: 55 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ İstanbul - Turkey
|
#1134
|
|
2011-02-11
, 18:21
|
Posts: 1,425 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Hong Kong
|
#1135
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 9000 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-11
, 18:25
|
Posts: 908 |
Thanked: 501 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ West Sussex, England
|
#1136
|
|
2011-02-11
, 18:30
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#1137
|
What I'm wondering:
Is W7 a smartphone OS at all? I know that the definition of smartphone is somewhat vague, no matter how you look at it. But there's a set of features that I simply expect in a smartphone, therefore they (for me) define a smartphone. These features are a combination of "what I expect from the computer-side of the smartphone" and "what I expect from the high end phone side". Examples: full multitasking, file system access, full controll of what can be shared (and how) via bluetooth/USB, copy/paste, freedom to install anything from any install-file you find on the web, video calls, MMS, ... Few smartphones have them all, but they have at least most of them. (And before you ask: No. I never considered any iPhone version a smartphone. Because of the features it lacks.)
Now W7 not only lacks some or many of these features. It lacks most or all of them, as far as I know. How come anyone calls it a smartphone-OS? What does W7 offer me as a (admittedly very demanding) consumer that S40 cannot provide? How can it compete with the platforms Nokia is about to abandon?
|
2011-02-11
, 18:31
|
|
Posts: 301 |
Thanked: 227 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Turkey
|
#1138
|
Android Market Allready has a "Nokia WP7 Emulator for Android". I kid you not!
Briliant App.
https://market.android.com/details?i...kiaWP7Emulator
|
2011-02-11
, 18:32
|
|
Posts: 698 |
Thanked: 129 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ CA
|
#1139
|
Nokia execs should ask themselves this: As the pioneer of PC market, why IBM doesn't have any product in the PC market today?
This is the same situation. MS will create an 'ecosystem' with the help of Nokia. And then cheaper products from Asia will take over that ecosystem. It doesn't matter for Microsoft who licenses their OS after all. In the end MS will have a great share of mobile OSes but Nokia will be long forgotten. IBM had the chance to return mainframe computer business but Nokia doesn't even have that.
The Following User Says Thank You to hordeman For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-11
, 18:32
|
Posts: 182 |
Thanked: 40 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#1140
|
Tags |
bye-nokia, i don't even, just shoot him, just shoot me, let's elope, lockdown, meego?fail, negatron dan, nokia defiled, nokia suicide, sell tulips, step 8 out of 5, the-end?, www.elop.org |
|
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc