Reply
Thread Tools
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#91
Originally Posted by romanianusa View Post
I just don't know why photoshop can't produce that kind of image.
you are doing it wrong? ps is just a tool, as good as the guy using it....
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
 
Posts: 141 | Thanked: 51 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Netherlands
#92
Originally Posted by romanianusa View Post
NO need to buy CS5..i got it FREE..hehe. Anyway, when i used the merge to HDR in CS5 with the raw images or the jpg from N900 gallery..it doesn't look nice like the one captured by the standalone HDR Capture. I try playing with different tuning and settings...it's just never the same and in situation, it's worst. I got 3 pics that i combined....and it didn't look good to me. When i look at the pic from HDR Capture where it combined by itself...it looks amazing fine and detail. I just don't know why photoshop can't produce that kind of image.
I know I can get it free
I just don't see why users need high end software just to view the dng image from this application. The file should be usable from all software that is capable of accessing dng files. I am not sure if the file produced by Fcam is a true dng file. I have asked before why this is but the developers never answer. Fcam is an amazing application and producing workable files is a must. I understand it is still in development so maybe this improvement is in the plans.
 
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#93
Originally Posted by pthomas22 View Post
I know I can get it free
I just don't see why users need high end software just to view the dng image from this application. The file should be usable from all software that is capable of accessing dng files. I am not sure if the file produced by Fcam is a true dng file. I have asked before why this is but the developers never answer. Fcam is an amazing application and producing workable files is a must. I understand it is still in development so maybe this improvement is in the plans.
there was a bug, now it should open with dcraw.
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
 
Switch_'s Avatar
Posts: 601 | Thanked: 549 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Redditch, UK
#94
Originally Posted by pthomas22 View Post
I just don't see why users need high end software just to view the dng image from this application
Because *.dng is the Digital Negative file format created by Adobe.... This format addressed a hitherto unstandardised archival format for RAW camera data files, which used to be any one of a plethora of file extensions, *.cr5, *.raw, *.nef, *.raf, *.orf, *.srf, *.sr2, *.arw, *.k25, *.kdc, *.dcr, *.mos, *.pnx, *.crw, *.cr2, *.tif, *.mrw, *.pef, *.mef to name but a few, and is at least standardising the RAW image format across the board, and could potentially become the industry standard for RAW formats. Since DNG is an "open" file format what this means is that either Adobe's Camera Raw converter built into Photoshop, or any third party program that adopts this format, will be able to interpret and convert these files today, and in the future.

It's not a question of high end software as any Google Search will tell you that you can pick up inexpensive conversion software and also find other proprietary ways of opening any *.dng file.

Maybe I'm wrong but standardisation is surely the way forward when you are talking about approximately 70 different types of RAW file extension... Maybe....?
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Switch_ For This Useful Post:
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#95
Originally Posted by Switch_ View Post
Since DNG is an "open" file format
lets just say it is openly documented format unlike every single other raw format....
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ossipena For This Useful Post:
Posts: 141 | Thanked: 51 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Netherlands
#96
Originally Posted by Switch_ View Post
Because *.dng is the Digital Negative file format created by Adobe.... This format addressed a hitherto unstandardised archival format for RAW camera data files, which used to be any one of a plethora of file extensions, *.cr5, *.raw, *.nef, *.raf, *.orf, *.srf, *.sr2, *.arw, *.k25, *.kdc, *.dcr, *.mos, *.pnx, *.crw, *.cr2, *.tif, *.mrw, *.pef, *.mef to name but a few, and is at least standardising the RAW image format across the board, and could potentially become the industry standard for RAW formats. Since DNG is an "open" file format what this means is that either Adobe's Camera Raw converter built into Photoshop, or any third party program that adopts this format, will be able to interpret and convert these files today, and in the future.

It's not a question of high end software as any Google Search will tell you that you can pick up inexpensive conversion software and also find other proprietary ways of opening any *.dng file.

Maybe I'm wrong but standardisation is surely the way forward when you are talking about approximately 70 different types of RAW file extension... Maybe....?

Standardisation is the way in my view but that means that files should be accessible by a large amount of software. In the case of Fcam images that is not the case but i will check after the updated software of last week
 
Posts: 141 | Thanked: 51 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Netherlands
#97
Originally Posted by ossipena View Post
there was a bug, now it should open with dcraw.
Cool. Does this mean that it will also open with Photoshop CS2 and the latest camera raw?
I don't see Fcam and the drivers showing up as an update( I assume it is still in extras testing). Do I have to uni-install the whole thing and start from scratch?
 
Posts: 356 | Thanked: 172 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Canada
#98
People complaining about the .DNGs really need to calm down, wait for a bugfix update to be released, and spend the interval time reading up on exactly what the .DNG format is meant to accomplish.

The developers of FCam should be lauded for choosing to use .DNG from the start.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingley Joe For This Useful Post:
Posts: 739 | Thanked: 114 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#99
Originally Posted by pthomas22 View Post
I know I can get it free
I just don't see why users need high end software just to view the dng image from this application. The file should be usable from all software that is capable of accessing dng files. I am not sure if the file produced by Fcam is a true dng file. I have asked before why this is but the developers never answer. Fcam is an amazing application and producing workable files is a must. I understand it is still in development so maybe this improvement is in the plans.
It was fine with HDR Capture where it combined 3 images of input to produce the result. I try duplicate that with the same 3 input of images with Photoshop CS5...it didn't come out the same. Where it ask to put manual EV...i didn't do nothing to do. Why do i need to figure out what the EV for each of the 3 pictures is. Anyway, no matter what i did....when i combined the 3 pictures....i am not getting the same fine result like the one the N900 does by itself.

Why do i need to use Photoshop? Because it's quicker to process.
 
Posts: 356 | Thanked: 172 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Canada
#100
By the way.. are the new FCam drivers 1.0.5-2 compatible with Titan's Kernel?
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:47.