gom4381
|
2010-05-03
, 21:16
|
Posts: 108 |
Thanked: 53 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Chicago
|
#101
|
|
2010-05-03
, 21:22
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#102
|
From that perspective, I fully understand why did Anssi Vanjoki downplayed the N900 all he could. There is a big difference between holding back and the platform just not being there.
...I honestly do not think Nokia made it especially clear that this was a 'niche' phone or something of the like. If they would have communicated this clearly to consumers they would not have as many issues because not as many people would have bought it... So maybe instead of the CEO being replaced, how about that marketing team????
Well, we know a bit. Enough to know that the 770 was a runaway success in their eyes (I've heard they expected about 5,000, but the number was about 50,000 when it was discontinued), I believe I've heard mention of the N800 being much the same and I've heard it from a large number of Nokians that the N900 completely blindsided them.
How much of this has to do with the clueless dinosaurs in the Symbian Old Guard, who can say, though.
|
2010-05-03
, 21:26
|
|
Posts: 733 |
Thanked: 991 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#103
|
|
2010-05-03
, 21:34
|
|
Posts: 276 |
Thanked: 224 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Frankfurt, Germany
|
#104
|
|
2010-05-03
, 21:37
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#105
|
You guys keep talking about the N900 like it is ready for the masses, and it isn't. The platform is not there yet. Again, it is not about holding back it just because.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to qole For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-05-03
, 21:43
|
|
Posts: 733 |
Thanked: 991 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#106
|
Sorry if you got that impression from me. I'm complaining about the lack of resources being put into the Maemo program, which causes the "not-mass-market-ready" problems that you're seeing.
The Following User Says Thank You to mrojas For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-05-03
, 21:44
|
Posts: 107 |
Thanked: 74 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#107
|
|
2010-05-03
, 21:45
|
Posts: 66 |
Thanked: 70 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Paris
|
#108
|
...
I think you take much more of a risk hiring people straight from school, because they're trained in all the buzzword technologies, but they have few or no demonstrated real skills yet. The real skills are the ones that always go in the second half of a job's qualifications, after they quote the things they think are important (what software / programming languages you know). You know, things like, "works well to a deadline with minimal supervision, quick learner, good problem solver..."
|
2010-05-03
, 21:46
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#109
|
|
2010-05-03
, 21:48
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#110
|
From that perspective, I fully understand why did Anssi Vanjoki downplayed the N900 all he could. There is a big difference between holding back and the platform just not being there.
Tags |
ceo firing, fooled again |
|