This is the one with the red bar on top, and which for some people crashes when you try to interact with the Flash elements on the page. The file size is exactly the same down to the byte, so there's almost no chance it's a different version.

It's "legitimate", but that doesn't necessarily mean it will run well for you.

Edit: Standard this-is-distributed-illegally disclaimers apply.

Seems like most people just want the one with a bigger number, and not one that offers any advantages over the current one + the sneaky tweak..

crc matches the other one that crashes and has the red line...

Yes its the same TI version

Reload the page whenever I try to interact with things - so, the same as with the big thread one |:/

hehehhe all of us wait someone 2 try it D

Im using the tweek flash plugin upped my N900 to the android ver10 and it works well on you tube and most other sights. Whats the big deal with 10.1 for the N900... what am I missing if I was to be using that what am I gonna gain? if any thing Id rather have a browser that opens as fast as my mrs I phone 4.. now that S*** is quick... makes the N900 speed in opening apps look like the old windows 95 thing..!! now if 10.1 can do that I'm all for adobe bashing... if it cant.. well Tweek flash will do..

Loz.

nothing to see here. I'm going to bed.

Question about totally hypothetical activities: Has someone who - hypothetically of course - downloaded this file, ran it, through, say, strings or strace or ltrace or, say, some disassemblers? If something like this were to hypothetically happen, what would the hypothetical outputs of such process be? (For dodging prosecution reasons I would presume such hypothetical individuals would use new accounts and proxies to post links to such outputs, so as to avoid incriminating maemo.org directly, but also preventing their own tracing without some difficulty. [I hear Sweden has a law that doesn't permit tracing internet traffic through them except for certain limited circumstances, so proxies routing through Swedish servers are probably nice for such things. But I presume such people would, if they existed, read up on such laws.])

'course, like I said, all hypothetical speculation. Just wondering whether or not that would hypothetically yield info to make the illegal leaked version more usable.

You can give it a try see if it works for you by simply renaming or backing up the original file you're supposed to replace here.

If its the "real deal" I don't really know, as I don't really know about these things. Like I said, this isn't "mine".

Works for me, although if the effects are huge I don't think so. No red bars or stuff you guys were talking about over here at least.

Bit worried about that legality bit, though. Can anyone confirm that?