![]() |
2009-03-04
, 14:09
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#12
|
I think we can safely assume that sjgadsby isn't an idiot.
Would you also respond to the same question but with "Tegra 650 devices" replaced with "OMAP3 devices" in the same way?
Perhaps it'll help if we rephrase it for you: "Will devices using the Tegra 650 be shipping by June?" Is that easier for you?
![]() |
2009-03-04
, 14:16
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#13
|
I posted for the benefit of the OP who seemed to be unsure (and I don't think he is an idiot).
![]() |
2009-03-04
, 14:40
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#14
|
![]() |
2009-03-22
, 23:57
|
Posts: 174 |
Thanked: 71 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
|
#15
|
Yes, I should have included a "based" or "powered" in there, I suppose. I had intended "Tegra 650 devices" to encompass any and all devices based upon that particular system on a chip, but I could have made that more explicit.
![]() |
2009-03-23
, 01:10
|
|
Posts: 96 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
@ Cincy,Ohio
|
#16
|
Would you also respond to the same question but with "Tegra 650 devices" replaced with "OMAP3 devices" in the same way?
Perhaps it'll help if we rephrase: "Will devices using the Tegra 650 be shipping by June?" Is that easier for you?
Ryan Abel