The Following User Says Thank You to bugelrex For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-27
, 02:35
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#12
|
What sources? That Nokia constantly favors Symbian over Maemo? I don't think we need sources to figure that one out.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-27
, 02:43
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#13
|
The hopeful parts of the article do show employees recognizing shortfalls and trying to innovate... it was the management blocking projects from going forward and insisting Symbian remain unchanged as much as possible
The Following User Says Thank You to tso For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-27
, 02:45
|
Posts: 459 |
Thanked: 669 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ The DMV
|
#14
|
Ugh, more mobile world as seen from US myopia.
before the apple app store i had used serveral phones that came with pre-configured shortcuts to "web stores" where i could download "apps" for my phones. the payment of these would be my monthly phone bill. And this was for "featurephones". And i am sure nokia ran something similar.
As for the touchscreen phone that never happened, is that a mention of the 7700?
Also, whats up with not mentioning the N800 or N810 that was followups to the 770? Its as if the 770 was the only device in the series.
|
2010-09-27
, 02:50
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#15
|
A bit ironic that an NYT article would be considered an example of US myopia, considering that the New York Times has an Anti-American agenda (if you believe the American extremist right, that is ).
In any case, the thrust of the article really concerns management decision-making, rather than technology. Citing a laundry list of omissions from the technology-side does not negate the main thesis of the article: Nokia's risk-averse, consensus-based, management culture of the past decade, while adequate for protecting the base business in the short-term, may not have been nimble, coherent, or decisive enough to generate the critical mass of innovation that can drive long-term growth.
The Following User Says Thank You to tso For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-27
, 03:11
|
Posts: 459 |
Thanked: 669 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ The DMV
|
#16
|
Thing is that the items are paraded as examples of bad management, yet the examples given are flawed. As such one can question the validity of the article itself, as any argument made from a flawed starting point is bound to end up with a flawed conclusion.
And i am unsure how NYTs political stance colors their technology reporting.
The Following User Says Thank You to klinglerware For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-27
, 03:28
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#17
|
I still don't think Arja Suominen's failure to remember the touchscreen phones released before the Nokia 770 and the nicer-spec'd Internet Tablets that came afterwards really invalidates the author's main point about Nokia's management culture. Although, it can be said that Suominen's shot at the ex-Nokia's employees as being small potatoes in the Nokia world does potentially speak volumes.
|
2010-09-27
, 03:40
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#18
|
|
2010-09-27
, 03:42
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#19
|
|
2010-09-27
, 03:47
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#20
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to slender For This Useful Post: | ||
If these types of employees are still around, the new CEO does have a chance of delivering the BEST COMMERCIALLY viable high-end phone.