![]() |
2007-06-11
, 01:16
|
Posts: 468 |
Thanked: 610 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
|
#12
|
![]() |
2007-06-11
, 05:24
|
|
Posts: 355 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#13
|
Excerpted........
My final conclusion is that the Nokia N800 has a mass of potential but I don't think Nokia executed it right in the first place, they gave too much freedom to the Open Source community without establishing a solid foundation to build upon, it just feels like a project gone wrong!
![]() |
2007-06-11
, 05:33
|
Posts: 751 |
Thanked: 522 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ East Gowanus
|
#14
|
![]() |
2007-06-11
, 07:23
|
Posts: 64 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
@ abuja, nigeria (currently)
|
#15
|
The reasons why I want the N95 inplace of the N800 is firstly I have no mobile at the momentso I need that, 2ndly I was either thinking of buying a good quality digital camera or a mobile with a decent camera, as I can hack the cam drivers and tweak them hopefully and decrease JPEG compression and overexposure
![]() |
2007-06-11
, 07:39
|
|
Posts: 355 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#16
|
check the shutter lag specs on the n95. if you've not used a digital camera before, borrow especially a cheap/old one and see what it is like to wait 1sec or so between pressing the button and actually capturing the image. for the price, this took it out of the "converged digital cam plus phone to always have with me". otoh, (1) I do a lot of photography and so am probably more demanding than average, and (2) there are some references around the web to a firmware upgrade which improves the shutter lag.
rob.
All your views seem very helpfully.
I am not selling the N800 and going for the N95 as a means of the N95 is "better". They both do very diffent things.
When I first got the N800 I was hoping that I could go around the whole of London, staying connected via the wifi spots and surf the web.
I don't mind the annoying boring aspect of installing apps etc but it's the lack on Nokia's side which I'm unhappy about with the N800.
To me, the N800 is used as an addon to your household, so you have the mobile phone, HTPC, wireless touchscreen remote and the N800 is something that would be by the sofa for quick logging on to the net.
I was hoping the webcam would have been MUCH more better in quality as it is very unsual as to why they didn't include even a 1.2 MP webcam
My final conclusion is that the Nokia N800 has a mass of potential but I don't think Nokia executed it right in the first place, they gave too much freedom to the Open Source community without establishing a solid foundation to build upon, it just feels like a project gone wrong!
The reasons why I want the N95 inplace of the N800 is firstly I have no mobile at the moment
If Nokia updated the Flash player, opera version, added better apps rather than old school PDA apps. Stuff like Canola should have been done by Nokia!
It's just too confusing for me to even think about lol., I'm so annoyed as to why they released something like this, and look at the price tag!!!!!! why is it so expensive?? what are we getting.. open source OS, barebone hardly anything provided, low grade camera, nasty interface and theres more and more lol WHY! :S
I think im just going to stay with the N95, and wait a few months, wait til something solid comes on the market.