Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 42 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#251
I was a bit surprised when I heard the specs of iPad. Almost 10 inch device with no flash support and OS you can't fiddle with is not for me. I have seriously considered iPhone but at the moment I am very happy with my N900.
 
Posts: 288 | Thanked: 196 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ London
#252
Nokia posts euro948 million net profit in Q4 (AP) - 64% increase in profits.

Big number from Nokia in Q4 2009 - 20.8 million smart phones and mobile computers (i.e. including N900 and Booklet 3G).

Oooh I feel so sorry for Nokia. Nokia is dying and Apple iPad will be the last nail in it coffin. Bye bye Nokia.
 
Posts: 3,401 | Thanked: 1,255 times | Joined on Nov 2005 @ London, UK
#253
Originally Posted by ossipena View Post
nope, those will appear partly when Symbian development goes to Qt, partly if Maemo -platform grows up and last but not least, gtk stuff ported from Maemo5.
You're *assuming* that Maemo will gain a load of new applications when Qt is ported to a completely different and as yet unavailable - Symbian^3,^4 - operating system!

Basically you're assuming Qt developers will be willing to port their apps to Symbian and Maemo and take on the burden of supporting both platforms, and while I know porting will be easier with Qt it's not a given that it will happen (even less likely if Maemo remains a niche player).

And you're also assuming Maemo developers will once again redevelop their apps for the third or fourth time. I'm sure many will, but it's getting a bit ridiculous, no?

You're also basing your comment on events that won't even happen until late this year, or more likely sometime next year - so, more waiting yes? All the time the competition moves on in leaps and bounds, gains more apps and even manages to maintain backward compatibility with all previous devices.

Your assumptions are far from convincing that thousands of apps will be coming to Maemo any time soon.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Milhouse For This Useful Post:
Posts: 16 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Jun 2009
#254
Ipad is the worst thing since Hitler imho
 
speculatrix's Avatar
Posts: 880 | Thanked: 264 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Cambridge, UK
#255
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/b...-201001282420/
__________________
Fujitsu U820, HTC Vision/G2/DesireZ, Nokia N800 770 E71, Zaurus 6000, Palm T3, Zaurus C3100 - stolen
 

The Following User Says Thank You to speculatrix For This Useful Post:
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#256
Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
You're *assuming* that Maemo will gain a load of new applications when Qt is ported to a completely different and as yet unavailable - Symbian^3,^4 - operating system!

Basically you're assuming Qt developers will be willing to port their apps to Symbian and Maemo and take on the burden of supporting both platforms, and while I know porting will be easier with Qt it's not a given that it will happen (even less likely if Maemo remains a niche player).
yes, I don't see any argument that proves my arguments wrong.

Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
And you're also assuming Maemo developers will once again redevelop their apps for the third or fourth time. I'm sure many will, but it's getting a bit ridiculous, no?
you don't read anything about nokias part. They have promised to give tools for porting.
Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
You're also basing your comment on events that won't even happen until late this year, or more likely sometime next year - so, more waiting yes? All the time the competition moves on in leaps and bounds, gains more apps and even manages to maintain backward compatibility with all previous devices.
yes, you are speculating pretty much now. nobody knows for sure what the mobile world will be in 2011
Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
Your assumptions are far from convincing that thousands of apps will be coming to Maemo any time soon.
have I said that thousands of apps are coming? I've only said that porting is done much easier and barrier of entry for both platforms at the same will become ridiculously low.
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
 
Posts: 308 | Thanked: 118 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ UK Swindon
#257
bloke opposit my desk came in all excited this morning (an iPhone user) and when I asked what the purpose of it (iPad - sounds like a lady pad or summat) was and why I should possibly want it over a much cheaper e reader or a netbook which gives me the option to use it with one or both hands easily, he told me to end the conversation and has not spoken to me since lol
 

The Following User Says Thank You to bonerp For This Useful Post:
Posts: 308 | Thanked: 118 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ UK Swindon
#258
Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
Trust me, the only thing Nokia and Maemo has going for it is it's open-ness - if Apple mobile devices didn't have all the restrictions we know them to have I'm pretty sure most of us wouldn't be here and would instead be all over Apple products like a rash. Same with Android, although to a lesser extent.

The one trick Nokia has up it's sleeve is the open platform it is pushing, we want that to succeed so much - no really, we do - that over the last 5 years we've overlooked the poor out-of-box experience, under developed stock applications and complete lack of services. After 5 years, and with only an improved out-of-box experience to really speak of, is it too much for you to understand that some of us are coming to the end of our tether?

point 1 - er no. I have a personality

point 2 - I've been quite pleased with Nokia compared to some of the competition. I feel they may have dragged their feet a bit but N900 and future devs are promising.
At the end of the day if Apples are so inviting, move to them. I think they are a bag of cr4p with nowhere near the level of functionality that I'm looking for. I have a brain and don't want to be guided on my phone usage by Apple or any other firm.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to bonerp For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,014 | Thanked: 1,581 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#259
iMeh.

Move along, nothing to see here.
__________________
Class .. : Power Poster, Potential Coder
Humor .. : [*********] Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Patience : [***-------] Weapon(s): +2 Logic Mace
Agro ... : |*****-----] Relic(s) : G1, N900

 

The Following User Says Thank You to Bratag For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,401 | Thanked: 1,255 times | Joined on Nov 2005 @ London, UK
#260
Originally Posted by bonerp View Post
point 1 - er no. I have a personality
I'll have to take your word for it, but criticising the users of competing products is hardly relevant when we are discussing the technology underlying those products.


Originally Posted by bonerp View Post
point 2 - I think they are a bag of cr4p with nowhere near the level of functionality that I'm looking for. I have a brain and don't want to be guided on my phone usage by Apple or any other firm.
That's why I said "if the competing products didn't have all the restrictions...".

I really don't think you can say the competing products are cr@p however - that's just being ridiculous. They may not meet the needs of a typical Maemo user, but they are far from cr@p.
 
Reply

Tags
apple, ifarted, ipad, tablet


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:57.