![]() |
2008-06-24
, 18:22
|
|
Posts: 716 |
Thanked: 236 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#21
|
![]() |
2008-06-24
, 18:59
|
Posts: 883 |
Thanked: 980 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Bern, Switzerland
|
#22
|
![]() |
2008-06-24
, 19:03
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#23
|
![]() |
2008-06-24
, 19:05
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
|
#24
|
![]() |
2008-06-24
, 19:21
|
Posts: 259 |
Thanked: 72 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Halifax, NS
|
#25
|
And most of those pretty weak arguments aren't fielded much, or are distorted versions. For example, no one (I know of) says the tablets shouldn't have PIM because they are not PDAs; they say that Nokia can't see PIM as an important goal to throw resources at because they are not intended as PDAs. Very different.
My main way of minimizing demand / excusing absence: "Hey, I don't use a PIM. If you want one, go write one, go march on Nokia HQ, or go whatever, but count me out." Usually, I express this by not posting directly on the topic;
One factor seldom addressed is that Nokia's applications generally have a tendency to be annoying and awkward to use, largely because of their UI spec. Therefore it might be better not to have Nokia produce a PIM, but pay a developer to work on an existing project (GPE, perhaps) outside the UI restrictions... (i.e. "throw some at a developer working...", as you said.)
![]() |
2008-06-24
, 19:31
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#26
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-06-24
, 19:40
|
Posts: 91 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#27
|
![]() |
2008-06-24
, 20:48
|
Posts: 32 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#28
|
![]() |
2008-06-24
, 20:51
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#29
|
![]() |
2008-06-24
, 21:08
|
Posts: 118 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#30
|
Uhh... Maybe we're reading a different forum then?I see that allll the time.
This is the bessssst way to be! Thank you. It irritates me to see x number of people really NEED a PIM and x number of people loudmouth all over them that there should never ever be a PIM on their precious device. To the PHBs, x - x = 0 so they don't even consider it.
I see kind of the same arguments about word processing. People actually express that they expect Google Docs would work fine. Excuse me? Have these people actually tried to USE GDocs on the tablet? Yikes. Now, though at first I really wanted a word processor, I have found that I don't desperately really need one now though. I would never say that one is simply not necessary though, because for some people it just might be..
I may be shortsighted, but I would be quite surprised if the number of people that need WiMax outnumbered the number of people that need a PIM. I can't imagine that the price of development was even close...
Another very good point. I hope Graham gets some kind of extra support out of this.