Active Topics

 



Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 692 | Thanked: 264 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#21
Originally Posted by cddiede View Post
Also remember that performance will be slow. While not as slow as straight up emulation (DosBox is NOT an emulator per say) DosBox has not been optimized for the N900's GPU, so the performance still leaves something to be desired when running software that's newer then 1993....
I guess I can forget about Terminal Velocity then... that was like the Crysis of DOS games
 
Arctine's Avatar
Posts: 70 | Thanked: 62 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#22
anyone know the resolution of the status bar at the top of the screen?
 
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#23
Originally Posted by cddiede View Post
While not as slow as straight up emulation (DosBox is NOT an emulator per say)
Note that DOSBox is an emulator in an ARM platform.

Originally Posted by cddiede View Post
DosBox has not been optimized for the N900's GPU, so the performance still leaves something to be desired when running software that's newer then 1993....
I fail to see what could the GPU be used for, other than for weird scaling ratios.

Your best bet for performance is to use PR1.1, put it in fullscreen mode and disable all scaling (and all sound if you're not using it). It won't get much better than that unless radical improvements to the recompiler.
 
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#24
Originally Posted by Arctine View Post
anyone know the resolution of the status bar at the top of the screen?
Yes, it's 60px.
 
Arctine's Avatar
Posts: 70 | Thanked: 62 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#25
Originally Posted by javispedro View Post
Note that DOSBox is an
Your best bet for performance is to use PR1.1, put it in fullscreen mode and disable all scaling (and all sound if you're not using it). It won't get much better than that unless radical improvements to the recompiler.
How does one do that?
 
SubCore's Avatar
Posts: 850 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Vienna, Austria
#26
Originally Posted by cddiede View Post
(DosBox is NOT an emulator per say)
sorry to be nitpicking but dosbox is a full emulator. it emulates a complete x86 PC.

and to add something constructive to this thread:
there's a hack available to enable right-click under dosbox, but it's not for the faint hearted. works, though


edit:
@arctine:
open the dosbox.conf file in a texteditor, it's all there, self-explanatory.
__________________
"What we perceive is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."
-- Werner Karl Heisenberg

Last edited by SubCore; 2010-01-19 at 18:59.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SubCore For This Useful Post:
Arctine's Avatar
Posts: 70 | Thanked: 62 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#27
Thanks. Still a bit choppy but better. The only problem now is the clicking is out of sync. Like, the mouse doesn't go where i touch, anyway to fix that?
 
cddiede's Avatar
Posts: 1,034 | Thanked: 784 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Annapolis, MD
#28
Originally Posted by SubCore View Post
sorry to be nitpicking but dosbox is a full emulator. it emulates a complete x86 PC.

open the dosbox.conf file in a texteditor, it's all there, self-explanatory.
Thanks. With all the debian stuff I've been doing with the N900, I actually forgot that it's not an X86 system for a minute there.
 
Arctine's Avatar
Posts: 70 | Thanked: 62 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#29
So, to ask again, is there any chance there will be better performance with DOSbox? I've already tweeked the .config to as good as it's gonna get.
 
Posts: 12 | Thanked: 5 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#30
Yup I have this fully down but the mouse pointer is out of sync still
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13.