|
2011-02-10
, 02:24
|
Posts: 701 |
Thanked: 585 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, England
|
#462
|
It's very clever for not confirming the authenticity of this memo at this moment, as Elop could always deny having written this memo later if he failed to persuade the board in changing direction. Cunning.
|
2011-02-10
, 02:26
|
Posts: 619 |
Thanked: 691 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#463
|
|
2011-02-10
, 02:38
|
Posts: 670 |
Thanked: 367 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#464
|
The purpose of this memo seems to be getting the readers (probably board members) to side with him in 1) switching OS platform from Symbian to something else and 2) focusing the resources from developing new platform (MeeGo) to developing a new ecosystem for existing OS platforms (other than Symbian)
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to buurmas For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-10
, 02:40
|
|
Posts: 337 |
Thanked: 283 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ NYC
|
#465
|
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
The Following User Says Thank You to Sopwith For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-10
, 02:54
|
Posts: 1,425 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Hong Kong
|
#466
|
What, you think he could plausibly deny something thousands of Nokia staff have seen?
It doesn't read to me like he actually wants to ditch Meego or Symbian, but he just isn't happy with the rate of progress they are making. It is more likely that this memo is a prelude to a major internal shake-up to cut the in-fighting inside Nokia and to bring their new ideas to market quicker.
|
2011-02-10
, 03:10
|
Posts: 1,425 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Hong Kong
|
#467
|
Cunning ?
If this memo is on the Nokia Intranet readable by all employees and has his name on it, its pretty hard for him to deny it later even if he erased the copy of the memo later....
... unless you really think he will claim someone hacked the system and faked the memo on the Nokia intranet and sent it to all employees ?
Come on... some common sense here
Cant believe some ppl are so hung up on Nokia future strategy - its a fuking mobile phone company - if you dont like them go elsewhere - whats the big deal.
and ppl say iphone fanbois are obsessed....
|
2011-02-10
, 03:12
|
Posts: 31 |
Thanked: 20 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
@ Finland / UK
|
#468
|
|
2011-02-10
, 03:17
|
Posts: 842 |
Thanked: 1,197 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#469
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RobbieThe1st For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-10
, 03:23
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#470
|
If Microsoft allows it on WP7 as a toolkit... It could help out Microsoft and Nokia at the same time as someone can write the same basic application for yet another platform.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
bye-nokia, i don't even, just shoot him, just shoot me, let's elope, lockdown, meego?fail, negatron dan, nokia defiled, nokia suicide, sell tulips, step 8 out of 5, the-end?, www.elop.org |
|
Okay that is really the quickiest solution in boosting Nokia's earnings in the short run; but as many people above has pointed out, that we won't want an android or wp7 phone from Nokia. Personally I'd prefer HTC over Nokia for an android.
Also the writer obviously doesn't like MeeGo. He pointed out (correctly) that the progress of deploying MeeGo is so slow that he won't expect to see more than one MeeGo release this year. If it's really out of the mouth of Elop then we'd pretty much putting any hope in MeeGo phone on hold this year. Well actually it might not be a bad thing indeed.
The purpose of this memo seems to be getting the readers (probably board members) to side with him in 1) switching OS platform from Symbian to something else and 2) focusing the resources from developing new platform (MeeGo) to developing a new ecosystem for existing OS platforms (other than Symbian)
Typical businessman from MS
Let's see if he could get enough board members to side with him in changing the direction of Nokia. I'd really doubt it. ^^
It's very clever for not confirming the authenticity of this memo at this moment, as Elop could always deny having written this memo later if he failed to persuade the board in changing direction. Cunning.
Last edited by 9000; 2011-02-10 at 02:08.