The Following User Says Thank You to johnel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-14
, 14:01
|
Posts: 248 |
Thanked: 43 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ US
|
#42
|
|
2010-09-14
, 14:04
|
|
Posts: 199 |
Thanked: 156 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Holland
|
#43
|
|
2010-09-14
, 14:09
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ London
|
#45
|
That would be MeeGo's role. Maemo was constrained in many ways (one model, one manufacturer, small team), but MeeGo *SHOULD* bring all that stuff you miss from Maemo at the scale of (at least) Android, but without being limited to a single class of devices.
It's not really about proficiency - sometimes it's just the wrong phone. That's why I asked if you ever used Linux - as your points were roughly what I hear when a long-time Windows users get to work with Linux boxes. It didn't really matter how experienced they were in Windows - in fact, often that experience worked against them as they expected a thing to work in one way, when in fact it did in another (as texrat says different != wrong).
It's all a question of scale. I struck me for example when you said Android brought Samsung out of obscurity - even before Android Samsung sold *shiploads* of phones (smartphones even), and even now, the Android/Galaxy sales are just a minority part in their overall business. It's just that they were not aiming at the gadget/app people as the target audience, and that's why you never heard of them prior to experimenting with Android.
PS. One tiny remark - Maemo was born loong before iOS and Android - not as a response to them (the N800 was already out when the iPhone was released and the N810 was released waaay before the first Android). If anything, the shame is that THAT advantage (especially considering the newly-rediscovered-by-Apple tablet market) was not capitalized upon.
|
2010-09-14
, 14:19
|
Posts: 999 |
Thanked: 1,117 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ earth?
|
#46
|
|
2010-09-14
, 14:47
|
Posts: 179 |
Thanked: 99 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Yorkshire, UK
|
#47
|
|
2010-09-14
, 14:52
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#48
|
No. Wrong. Only way to measure if product has failed is to see it sales and feedback from device owners. Only one who sees these statistics is the seller itself. So you can only make vagues guesses how well something has succeed. And of course the problem itself is that how to measure and what is the scale itself.
If you try to make statement about failure then you need shitload of references and statistics from 3rd party sellers. Without those you are just yelling fool who can wear clown suit (like most of tech. bloggers and commentators in blogs, just bunch of fools who think that their opinion without arguments or references is worth something) :|
Only thing you can say is that device has failed FOR YOU. Big difference!
|
2010-09-14
, 14:54
|
Posts: 1,048 |
Thanked: 1,127 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Amsterdam
|
#49
|
Yeah good points. And no I haven't used Linux in it's purest form. I have an uBuntu machine and use Firefox but thats as close as it gets! Maybe these are good examples to my point: Anyone can use an uBuntu machine and Firefox is very popular, especially amongst people who probably don't even know what Linux is. So Maemo should provide the seemless user experience for all level of users regardless of their Linux knowledge.
|
2010-09-14
, 15:01
|
Posts: 999 |
Thanked: 1,117 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ earth?
|
#50
|
with this:
I like cake.