![]() |
2010-10-23
, 20:54
|
Posts: 22 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#52
|
![]() |
2010-10-23
, 20:57
|
Posts: 22 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#53
|
![]() |
2010-10-23
, 22:14
|
Banned |
Posts: 778 |
Thanked: 337 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#55
|
![]() |
2010-10-23
, 22:54
|
Banned |
Posts: 974 |
Thanked: 622 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#56
|
![]() |
2010-10-24
, 01:12
|
Posts: 152 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Shanghai, China
|
#57
|
Where's the (real and practical) unique selling point for MeeGo; compared against Android, iOS and WP7?
![]() |
2010-10-24
, 01:25
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#58
|
too late for what? do you sign a contract with Win7, iPhone and/or android that you must use the same OS for the rest of your life or you must be killed or something?
![]() |
2010-10-24
, 01:34
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#59
|
When Android came to town...
Blackberry = Strong in enterprise, generally weak everywhere else.
Apple = Strong contender, but had serious issues with Job's 'deathgrip' (artificial limitations). Targets the top niche of the price range.
Symbian = Weak brand name. Lots of hidden (buried?) capabilities. It was 'sold with the phone', imho they're much less so (not really?) a contender in this respect.
I don't see any reason why MeeGo should be a great smartphone OS, at least not for some time when HW has evolved some more.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-10-24
, 01:49
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#60
|
Agreed with ericsson. The answer is none.
And the Nokia will not open the UI to other vendors.
So, I dont think big vendor, such as motorola, sonyericsson, htc, samsung etc will use MeeGo.
And MeeGo may be appear at many place, such as in tablet, or in your car (actually, there are few products now), but it cannot be the reason for the success of MeeGo. Android can do the same thing.
If there is no 'killer advantages' on MeeGo,
then the apps & developers of iOS & Android will be dominant Pros to beat MeeGo.
Because they already exist and do quite well, why should I change to a new one with the same function ?
When Android came out, iPhone is still accumulating users, now both iOS and Android become stronger and stronger. WP7 is also a big player.
But when N9 release on 2011, it is too late.
The smartphone market has been occupied by iOS, Android and WP7 !
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
troll, trololololol |
|
iOS has to be taken out of the list. iOS isn't sold separately. iOS and iPhone is one inseparable package. In a similar manner Symbian and Nokia is one package, at least that is how most people see it even though it is not technically entirely correct.
What we are left with that has some reality behind it is Android vs MeeGo on tablets. You may argue that people want Android. I say that is just US blogging nonsense. People want value, they want the web (and everything with it, and lots of it), they want HDMI, they want quality. The name of the OS means nothing. They want this