Active Topics
-
Camera phone competition March 2023 "Endless" (35)
to General by Maemish - 23 hrs, 36 mins ago -
TLS 1.2 for N9 is ready (28)
to MeeGo / Harmattan by smartblu9 - 1 day ago -
Maemo repository (3)
to Community by torsen - 1 day, 16 hrs ago -
Error after installing Leste on sdcard (11)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Maemish - 2 days, 13 hrs ago -
Introducing ubiboot N9 (multiboot OS loader) (1,393)
to Alternatives by smatkovi - 3 days, 20 hrs ago - more...
| The Following User Says Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-05-18
, 20:49
|
|
Posts: 9 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on May 2014
|
#702
|
right, how to remove kernel-power-settings? or maybe simplier to update to kp v53? according to Alecsandru post it seems that readings are far better than mine.
|
|
2014-05-18
, 21:08
|
|
Posts: 1,378 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Göteborg, Sweden
|
#703
|
Thanks Estel - I had missed that the reference was to the kp-settings and not kp itself.
Updating to kp53 likely will not help as kernel-power-settings may be essentially the same ie. still carry the bug.
You can remove kernel-power-settings v0.17 normally, as it will not remove kp52. And I believe I was also correct in noting that if you installed cssu-testing, you would have the modules required for usbmode and (?) aircrack, without needing a power kernel.
Last edited by handaxe; 2014-05-18 at 21:16.
Updating to kp53 likely will not help as kernel-power-settings may be essentially the same ie. still carry the bug.
You can remove kernel-power-settings v0.17 normally, as it will not remove kp52. And I believe I was also correct in noting that if you installed cssu-testing, you would have the modules required for usbmode and (?) aircrack, without needing a power kernel.
Last edited by handaxe; 2014-05-18 at 21:16.
 |
|
2014-05-18
, 21:23
|
|
Posts: 439 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Oct 2012
|
#704
|
maybe he can try a custom profile for kernel config , taking the default one and lowering voltages?
__________________
N900 Beast featuring :
8GB OPTFS@ext4(*performance mount options)
overclock: cpu[125 - 1,150(*VDD1)+Dsp overclock
CSSU-T latest version
N900 Beast featuring :8GB OPTFS@ext4(*performance mount options)
overclock: cpu[125 - 1,150(*VDD1)+Dsp overclock
CSSU-T latest version
|
|
2014-05-18
, 22:37
|
|
Posts: 9 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on May 2014
|
#705
|
So, as you suggested, I have deleted kernel-power-settings but probably it did not made major changes.
after few restarts powertop gave me same result as before
C# | Ratio | Avg/dura | Frequency | Ratio
--------+--------+----------+-----------+--------+
C0 | 17.9% | | 1150 MHz | nan% |
C1 | 0.5% | 2.5ms |
C2 | 4.1% | 4.5ms |
C3 | 18.4% | 147.1ms |
C4 | 61.2% | 612.0ms |
I think my next step will be uninstallation of the kp or reflashing.
after few restarts powertop gave me same result as before
C# | Ratio | Avg/dura | Frequency | Ratio
--------+--------+----------+-----------+--------+
C0 | 17.9% | | 1150 MHz | nan% |
C1 | 0.5% | 2.5ms |
C2 | 4.1% | 4.5ms |
C3 | 18.4% | 147.1ms |
C4 | 61.2% | 612.0ms |
I think my next step will be uninstallation of the kp or reflashing.
|
|
2014-05-18
, 23:34
|
|
Posts: 1,378 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Göteborg, Sweden
|
#706
|
Originally Posted by evropean
Remember to use the correct procedure for that uninstall
I think my next step will be uninstallation of the kp or reflashing.
A reflash may be best - reflash -> powertop confirmation all's OK -> CSSU testing (or thumb) -> powertop confirmation -> usbmode.
What I would do, clean slate etc..
|
|
2014-05-19
, 09:15
|
|
Posts: 3,074 |
Thanked: 12,964 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Sofia,Bulgaria
|
#707
|
Originally Posted by evropean
What are all those "sleep" processes in your powertop output? Did you install some magic "patch" by chance?
So, as you suggested, I have deleted kernel-power-settings but probably it did not made major changes.
after few restarts powertop gave me same result as before
C# | Ratio | Avg/dura | Frequency | Ratio
--------+--------+----------+-----------+--------+
C0 | 17.9% | | 1150 MHz | nan% |
C1 | 0.5% | 2.5ms |
C2 | 4.1% | 4.5ms |
C3 | 18.4% | 147.1ms |
C4 | 61.2% | 612.0ms |
I think my next step will be uninstallation of the kp or reflashing.
could you pastebin the result of "maemo-list-user-packages"?
__________________
Never fear. I is here.
720p video support on N900,SmartReflex on N900,Keyboard and mouse support on N900
Nothing is impossible - Stable thumb2 on n900
Community SSU developer
kernel-power developer and maintainer
Never fear. I is here.
720p video support on N900,SmartReflex on N900,Keyboard and mouse support on N900
Nothing is impossible - Stable thumb2 on n900
Community SSU developer
kernel-power developer and maintainer
|
|
2014-05-19
, 09:16
|
|
Posts: 3,074 |
Thanked: 12,964 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Sofia,Bulgaria
|
#708
|
Originally Posted by Estel
What is that misterious bug you're talking about that I am not aware of?
...Indeed, this may be the cause of very rare (and untracked, yet) bug, that only few people experienced...
/Estel
__________________
Never fear. I is here.
720p video support on N900,SmartReflex on N900,Keyboard and mouse support on N900
Nothing is impossible - Stable thumb2 on n900
Community SSU developer
kernel-power developer and maintainer
Never fear. I is here.
720p video support on N900,SmartReflex on N900,Keyboard and mouse support on N900
Nothing is impossible - Stable thumb2 on n900
Community SSU developer
kernel-power developer and maintainer
|
|
2014-05-19
, 12:46
|
|
Posts: 1,378 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Göteborg, Sweden
|
#709
|
Originally Posted by freemangordon
I believe Estel was conjecturing that there may be a bug given the current case and that of tanago starting here and culminating with this statement from tanago.
What is that misterious bug you're talking about that I am not aware of?
Thanks for chipping in here - I saw those sleep processes but don't know enuff to realise they were way wrong. However, installing some or other patch and not mentioning it on a troubleshooting thread would be unhelpful :-)
Last edited by handaxe; 2014-05-19 at 12:52.
|
|
2014-05-30
, 22:47
|
|
Posts: 1,378 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Göteborg, Sweden
|
#710
|
If <4hrs means 2 :-) I think it's a little lean on juice. Truly intensive what you describe for close to 4 hrs is perhaps reasonable. Thing is, a polarcell replacement is not that much, and hey, irritation of calibration aside, you will know how the other one stacks up.
Charging can take a couple of hours, not so? But not 4 hours with stock Nokia charger.
Charging can take a couple of hours, not so? But not 4 hours with stock Nokia charger.
| The Following User Says Thank You to handaxe For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
| Tags |
| n900 battery, n900 v. power war, piss poor |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:04.
You may keep kernel-power and get rid of kernel-power-settings. Indeed, this may be the cause of very rare (and untracked, yet) bug, that only few people experienced. Anyway, you can do everything that kernel-power-setting does yourself, without actually using KPS.
/Estel
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!