|
2006-05-30
, 17:39
|
|
Posts: 1,245 |
Thanked: 421 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
|
#72
|
If it is a choice between a high CPU fancy rubber-band selection or a simple low CPU remember the last two taps, I would be very happy sticking with this existing two taps solution. It is much better than those fields being left blank.
In my experience, the current usability problem with the current approach is that the map scrolls when you are trying to make your selection ... often times scrolling your intended second point off the screen. The solution is to zoom out to a bigger area and then manually change the zoom selection back to your intended scale to download.
It would be great if the selection box idea could be done efficiently but I am pretty happy with the esisting simple approach.
|
2006-05-30
, 19:08
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#73
|
Sorry for missing your question to first time around. I have no plans at the moment to get Maemo Mapper to work with TerraServer.
But if anyone wants to write a patch (as was done to incorporate the initial Google Maps satellite data), feel free to do so.
|
2006-05-30
, 19:51
|
Posts: 373 |
Thanked: 56 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
@ Ottawa, ON
|
#74
|
|
2006-05-30
, 21:29
|
Posts: 177 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Apr 2006
@ Wirral, UK
|
#75
|
|
2006-05-31
, 06:37
|
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Espoo, Finland
|
#76
|
|
2006-05-31
, 11:20
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
|
#77
|
Hi,
I'm still getting the "Error parsing GPX file" errors when downloading the route from Maemo Mapper v0.2.3. Any idea what might be causing this? If I download the route using the web service and after re-saving it using the Notes application the route works. So seems like there is some format problem or something.
Sorry if this issue has already been dealt with. These threads are just so long that I don't have time to go them through.
|
2006-05-31
, 14:48
|
Posts: 13 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
|
#78
|
The problem has been reported previously, but has not been solved. It appears to me that any non-ASCII character in the .gpx file will lead to a parsing error being reported. This takes away some of the fun from an otherwise brilliant application, for those located in in countries where road and city names contain non-ASCII characters. I vote for inserting this problem into the to-do list.
Regards,
Reiner
|
2006-05-31
, 17:33
|
|
Posts: 1,245 |
Thanked: 421 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
|
#79
|
The problem has been reported previously, but has not been solved. It appears to me that any non-ASCII character in the .gpx file will lead to a parsing error being reported. This takes away some of the fun from an otherwise brilliant application, for those located in in countries where road and city names contain non-ASCII characters. I vote for inserting this problem into the to-do list.
Regards,
Reiner
|
2006-05-31
, 18:01
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on May 2006
|
#80
|
...I am finding that there is the odd map that gets downloaded from Google Maps that is in the wrong scale (I believe this is Google's fault as it seems to cough up random things when the server is busy ...
But if anyone wants to write a patch (as was done to incorporate the initial Google Maps satellite data), feel free to do so.