Active Topics

 


Page 1 of 2 1 2
Reply
Thread Tools
daperl's Avatar
daperl is offline daperl
2011-10-31 , 02:55
Posts: 2,427 | Thanked: 2,986 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#1
It's about time:

http://arstechnica.com/open-source/n...nd-tablets.ars

It seems likely that the Qt-based Unity 2D experience will serve as the mobile implementation. The Qt Quick user interface design framework is well-suited for building touch-friendly mobile experiences.
__________________
N9: Go white or go home
 

The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post:
buurmas is offline buurmas
2011-10-31 , 04:12
Posts: 670 | Thanked: 367 times | Joined on Mar 2009
#2
That's a win for Qt! I'm excited about this. Ubuntu's huge app catalog makes this very attractive. Of course, I'd rather have apps developed for touch than apps developed for the traditional kbd & mouse setup... BUT I'd still rather have a traditional app for a particular need than no app at all!
__________________
* n810 since Feb 2009
* Most-used apps: Opera, gPodder, Panucci, Tomiku, Canola, Quasar, MaemoMapper, ATI85, Maemopad+, AisleRiot Solitaire, Anagramarama, Rapier, Gnumeric, pyRDesktop
* Mobile-friendly URLs of popular sites
 
lma is offline lma
2011-10-31 , 04:31
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#3
Well, they've been trying to do "mobile" since forever (see eg here). I'll believe it when I see it.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post:
gerbick
2011-10-31 , 05:16
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#4
So it's a go for them... again? Let's see if they pull this one off finally.

If they do, this could be a great thing.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Joseph9560 is offline Joseph9560
2011-10-31 , 05:34
Posts: 440 | Thanked: 160 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Las Vegas, NV
#5
Originally Posted by buurmas View Post
That's a win for Qt! I'm excited about this. Ubuntu's huge app catalog makes this very attractive. Of course, I'd rather have apps developed for touch than apps developed for the traditional kbd & mouse setup... BUT I'd still rather have a traditional app for a particular need than no app at all!
Didn't debian has a huge catelog????? How much of those were ported to maemos?
 
demolition is offline demolition
2011-10-31 , 05:57
Posts: 560 | Thanked: 422 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#6
Originally Posted by Joseph9560 View Post
Didn't debian has a huge catelog????? How much of those were ported to maemos?
Anything in the Lenny catalogue, which is in the "armel" list runs in EasyDebian on the N900. These don't "need" to be ported to get them to work. To run in Maemo, software needs often needs a UI tweak (rewrite!).

A proper Ubuntu mobile device would be interesting indeed. I wonder how open eiher the drivers or UI would be? The bits already are,, thankfully. Perhaps this could be N900 mk.2 ?
 
Joseph9560 is offline Joseph9560
2011-10-31 , 06:30
Posts: 440 | Thanked: 160 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Las Vegas, NV
#7
Originally Posted by demolition View Post
Anything in the Lenny catalogue, which is in the "armel" list runs in EasyDebian on the N900. These don't "need" to be ported to get them to work. To run in Maemo, software needs often needs a UI tweak (rewrite!).

A proper Ubuntu mobile device would be interesting indeed. I wonder how open eiher the drivers or UI would be? The bits already are,, thankfully. Perhaps this could be N900 mk.2 ?
That way even applications ment for ubuntu armel apps would also run in maemo 5 under easy ubuntu. So why do we need that new os?

A bit of overclocking and simple (as well as complex) apps do run under the those chroots but would ubuntu mobile required chrooting ubuntu pc as well or would those apps ment for armel run without any modification (ui might be crappy, I don't care)?

While I am no expert at those things I don't think those apps will run out of the box.

About openness, if I am not wrong, pc ubuntu has number of closed sourced things. I am not sure if ui is closed in pc version. If ui is open in pc version I would expect the same with mobile as well. And about those drivers, probably it is more upto the hardware vendors as usual.
 
Kangal's Avatar
Kangal is offline Kangal
2011-10-31 , 09:23
Posts: 1,789 | Thanked: 1,699 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#8
While Ubuntu wants go mobile (again), they should also port Dalvik, cure cancer and bring world peace.

Can I add in a '11 Porsche 911 Turbo S for me in that list?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Kangal For This Useful Post:
bergie's Avatar
bergie is offline bergie
2011-10-31 , 09:41
Posts: 381 | Thanked: 847 times | Joined on Jan 2007 @ Helsinki
#9
Originally Posted by buurmas View Post
That's a win for Qt! I'm excited about this. Ubuntu's huge app catalog makes this very attractive. Of course, I'd rather have apps developed for touch than apps developed for the traditional kbd & mouse setup... BUT I'd still rather have a traditional app for a particular need than no app at all!
Quite a lot of the new GNOME and KDE stuff is striving for touch-friendliness. So at some point "regular Linux apps" might work OK on a mobile device.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bergie For This Useful Post:
pelago's Avatar
pelago is offline pelago
2011-11-02 , 16:56
Posts: 2,121 | Thanked: 1,540 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Oxford, UK
#10
For interest, here is Shuttleworth's blog post about this. http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/820 . Personally I think this could be interesting, although I notice that haven't announced any mobile hardware partners yet.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to pelago For This Useful Post:
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:56.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top