Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 607 | Thanked: 450 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Washington, DC
#1
Chippy Paine of UMPC Portal is trying to get an idea of power to weight ratios by compiling results of a Javascript benchmark at:

http://friendfeed.com/chippy/e3f1baa...io-what-yours#

Since I don't have an N900 and the N800 is already posted, how about someone with an N900 running the test (which is online) and posting the results. We should be able to pwn the 3GS.
 
Posts: 2,829 | Thanked: 1,459 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Finland
#2
15.6
..............
.edit
So microb is one of slowest in javas?

.edit
Second test (new?) from link just hangs. Microb says that script stopped resonding.
...edit
No it ended finally 14.3

Last edited by slender; 2010-01-24 at 23:34.
 
b666m's Avatar
Posts: 1,090 | Thanked: 476 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Ingolstadt, Germany
#3
v3: 14.9
v5: 16.9
with microb asking me if i want to stop the running process.

it's quite annoying... especially when i see the stats for the iphone 3gs.. and when i think about that the n900 is using javascript for viewing all messages :/

Last edited by b666m; 2010-01-25 at 00:03.
 
Posts: 607 | Thanked: 450 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Washington, DC
#4
Originally Posted by slender View Post
15.6
..............
.edit
So microb is one of slowest in javas?

.edit
Second test (new?) from link just hangs. Microb says that script stopped resonding.
...edit
No it ended finally 14.3
Oops.
 
Posts: 2,829 | Thanked: 1,459 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Finland
#5
I'm sorry but this just makes me laugh. Microb seems to be dead slow on javas So itīs not so weird that gmails default webmail interface is so jerky.

.edit
Maybe we should put up Brainstrom about this and make different suggestions about what to do. And be really careful that no-one upsets by our whining

Last edited by slender; 2010-01-24 at 23:50.
 
b666m's Avatar
Posts: 1,090 | Thanked: 476 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Ingolstadt, Germany
#6
v5: 16.1
with firefox asking the same as microb.
v5: 21.1
with firefox and used "don't ask again" before. ^^
 
b666m's Avatar
Posts: 1,090 | Thanked: 476 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Ingolstadt, Germany
#7
v3: 52.0
v5: 57.4
with tear. ^^
 
Posts: 60 | Thanked: 59 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#8
Seriously, this is nosense. You are trying to make a comparison between two javascript engines one of which has been optimized to run those tests and the other one who doesn't. Mozillas and Webkits implementation of Javascript are pretty close performance wise.
 
Posts: 2,829 | Thanked: 1,459 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Finland
#9
tested tear for fun and not so suprisingly it loads javas pages faster. Sad that panning is slow and makes it unusable.

.edit
actually it seems to load all pages faster for me.
 
b666m's Avatar
Posts: 1,090 | Thanked: 476 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Ingolstadt, Germany
#10
v5: 63.9
with midori. ^^
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:27.