![]() |
2010-03-12
, 20:23
|
|
Posts: 1,217 |
Thanked: 446 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Bedfordshire, UK
|
#2
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fargus For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-03-12
, 20:26
|
Posts: 52 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ USA
|
#3
|
The post you have is not very clear on the issue. Are you saying that your company has short codes on the company phone system that automatically dials the relevant mobile number?
The N900 picks up the transmitted caller id given by the network. If the company aren't transmitting their number or the carrier isn't forwarding that to the phone then this isn't the N900 at fault, no phone would be able to do this.
Can you clarify your situation please?
![]() |
2010-03-13
, 21:06
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#4
|
![]() |
2010-03-13
, 21:22
|
|
Posts: 1,217 |
Thanked: 446 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Bedfordshire, UK
|
#5
|
![]() |
2010-03-13
, 23:05
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Germany
|
#7
|
![]() |
2010-03-14
, 20:12
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#8
|
I'm not experienced in this stuff, but as far as I understand your problem, I wonder whether you store both versions of numbers for each contact entry or only the long one. I'd understand, that N900 cannot provide the mapping from long to short versions. But, I'd guess, that if you kept both versions for each entry, N900 should recognize the correct caller.
![]() |
2010-03-16
, 00:49
|
|
Posts: 1,217 |
Thanked: 446 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Bedfordshire, UK
|
#9
|
Is there any way to fix this problem?Other way I have to sell this phone
Thanks for your help.