The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to acf For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-10-09
, 11:49
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 3,718 |
Thanked: 7,420 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bize Her Yer Trabzon
|
#4
|
|
2012-10-09
, 11:51
|
|
Posts: 4,365 |
Thanked: 2,467 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Australia Mate
|
#5
|
The Following User Says Thank You to F2thaK For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-10-09
, 11:55
|
|
Posts: 4,365 |
Thanked: 2,467 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Australia Mate
|
#6
|
All n900's except for the dev versions were made in Korea, straight from my colleagues' mouths at Nokia.
The Following User Says Thank You to F2thaK For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-10-09
, 12:07
|
|
Posts: 1,359 |
Thanked: 1,292 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
@ Tartus.Syria
|
#8
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sifo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-10-09
, 12:07
|
Posts: 91 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
|
#9
|
The Following User Says Thank You to c4rl05 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-10-09
, 12:13
|
Posts: 896 |
Thanked: 978 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Greece, Athens
|
#10
|
For example, the text "Dexigned in Finland" on the back of the screen instead of the normal "Designed in Finland." The glass covering the area around front facing camera is also more clear. The device ran Maemo 5 out of the box, and included a battery with the Nokia hologram, as well as other apparently original accessories. The IMEI that appears in "about device" looks like a valid Nokia IMEI. The label under the battery indicates that the phone was made in Finland.
The boxes are very similar too, but have some differences. For example, the absence of an inner flap on one, and the placement and layout of the white label with the IMEI on it. Is this a knock-off, or could it just be an early revision of the N900?
I've attached some images.
Thanks,
acf