Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 182 | Thanked: 540 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Finland
#41
Originally Posted by jalyst View Post
Linked-in tells me you were (until recently) a "senior engineer" for Nokia.
I see no specific mention of work done in the area of video-out.
Good for you and thanks for your efforts...
But how does this prove you know anything about the implementation/s (current/future) of vid-out for the N9?
Perhaps you looked at different linkedin profile? I wasn't an engineer, it was a bit different.

Anyway, if you don't take a word of a person who worked on the platform and the devices, that's up to you. I never hidden my credentials on this web site and never had made a statement that I don't stand behind. However, you probably could understand that even after departing my former employer, I'm bound with certain chains with regards to exact details. What can be revealed is something that you could otherwise find yourself from large track of our open source activities and Nokia's already published materials anyway.

I hope it is not viewed as a personal attack...
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to abbra For This Useful Post:
Dave999's Avatar
Posts: 7,075 | Thanked: 9,073 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
#42
How do we get correct information in the first post without OP?

Focus on the device please in this thread before I make the whole forum go off topic Yes, I can do that.
__________________
Do something for the climate today! Anything!

I don't trust poeple without a Nokia n900...
 
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#43
Originally Posted by abbra View Post
Perhaps you looked at different linkedin profile? I wasn't an engineer, it was a bit different.
It says "senior architect",
I assumed that meant you were a lead software engineer/programmer @Nok.
My apologies....

Anyway, if you don't take a word of a person who worked on the platform and the devices, that's up to you. I never hidden my credentials on this web site and never had made a statement that I don't stand behind. However, you probably could understand that even after departing my former employer, I'm bound with certain chains with regards to exact details. What can be revealed is something that you could otherwise find yourself from large track of our open source activities and Nokia's already published materials anyway.
Fair enough, I guess I'll take your word for it
But please, at least answer us this...

Why on earth didn't you guys implement at least 720p-out?
IIRC, even 2yrs ago 480i composite-out was nothing special.
Were you guys oblivious to what competitors were doing?
Don't you think it's counter-intuitive to devise a phone that does 720p recording*, but can't do 720p-out?

Yes built-in WiFi + DLNA, & USB-OTG can help mitigate this to some extent.
And they're both useful features in their own right...
But neither are a suitable replacement for decent video-out.

I think the job you guys have done "overall" is very solid/excellent.
But when it comes to hardware there's some areas where you've been very conservative, even backward.
And this is alienating/bewildering many potential customers.

*even that's anaemic by today's standards, but at least it'll be "good quality" 720p capture.

I hope it is not viewed as a personal attack...
None taken at all, & apologies if I've caused any offence to you.

Originally Posted by Dave999 View Post
<SNIP> before I make the whole forum go off topic Yes, I can do that.
Yes you can, yes indeed you can... *shudder*
Don't worry I'm wrapping it up ASAP.
I definitely don't want to unleash your fearsome trolling abilities

Last edited by jalyst; 2011-07-11 at 14:57.
 
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#44
Sigh... waste of time asking....
Just got a PM from Abbra saying he can't (legally) address this post.
As they're questions for Nokia Product Management.
Understandable... but still hugely frustrating

Last edited by jalyst; 2011-07-27 at 18:27.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post:
Posts: 24 | Thanked: 13 times | Joined on Jun 2011
#45
Originally Posted by DeeGee View Post
There has been 3rd party made decoders for OMAP that can handle bigger resolutions/profiles than the ones provided by TI. I guess Nokia hasn't dished the money to buy them and are using the TI ones.
I googled this kind of thing: http://www.ittiam.com/en/Embedded/Pl...0p-Bundle.aspx

Well, I know that's the matter of reencoding but if I could avoid that...
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to steveburczymucha For This Useful Post:
Posts: 194 | Thanked: 127 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Manchester, UK
#46
Originally Posted by quipper8 View Post
and cyan is not blue...
Nine out of ten cats said it was blue!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to jpfsn For This Useful Post:
Posts: 8 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#47
Originally Posted by jalyst View Post
Why on earth didn't you guys implement at least 720p-out?
IIRC, even 2yrs ago 480i composite-out was nothing special.
Were you guys oblivious to what competitors were doing?
Don't you think it's counter-intuitive to devise a phone that does 720p recording*, but can't do 720p-out?
I think asking such questions from a _software_ architect is just rude. Do you think the software people are responsible for the hardware design?

BTW OMAP3 isn't actually designed for the use case you desire. Making it work would likely involve extra hardware and some interesting software gymnastics, and even then the result would probably be less than stellar.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to syrjala For This Useful Post:
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#48
Originally Posted by Dave999 View Post
How do we get correct information in the first post without OP?

Focus on the device please in this thread before I make the whole forum go off topic Yes, I can do that.
Please refrain from threats and pretending you are a thug.
__________________
All I want is 40 acres, a mule, and Xterm.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post:
shallimus's Avatar
Posts: 568 | Thanked: 969 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Toronto
#49
Originally Posted by jalyst View Post
@shallimus

I just started a similar (albeit w/a subtly diff. focus) thread here
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...59#post1047959
I was not aware you'd already stared one...
If you intend to actively maintain this one, then I'm happy to ditch it.
So as to avoid a "division of labour"? Lemme know.

Cheers
Yes, I'll maintain this as best I can. Been very busy the last week or so, but I'll keep an eye out.

Updated FMTX section and added DLNA mention, but - unless I've missed it - I still don't see a clear explanation how how DLNA can perform the same job as HDMI out (my understanding is that it cannot - please confirm/correct using citations wherever possible if you are in a position to do so).

Please let me know if there's anything else I can update in Post #1 to make it more useful/accurate (I'm sure there's lots).
__________________
tinfoilhat.dll: Trojan horse detected
Sailfish want list: calendar bugfixes, glanceable agenda, Swype or similar
Evolution continues (but we're still pre-Cambrian)


Last edited by shallimus; 2011-07-10 at 21:44.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to shallimus For This Useful Post:
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#50
Originally Posted by syrjala View Post
I think asking such questions from a _software_ architect is just rude. Do you think the software people are responsible for the hardware design?
Um yes, I think he would know...
But he's already explained to me why he can't go into more detail, & I accept that without qualm.

BTW OMAP3 isn't actually designed for the use case you desire. Making it work would likely involve extra hardware and some interesting software gymnastics, and even then the result would probably be less than stellar.
I've previously pointed out that the underlying SoC (3630) is a limiting factor.
But not in the way you assert...
There's no reason MHL 720p-out functionality couldn't be added to TI's 'reference design' SoC.
Whether there's enough grunt to output to 720p displays without grinding everything else to a halt.
Is where it gets unclear...

Last edited by jalyst; 2011-07-11 at 07:21.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:07.