Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 10 hrs, 49 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 23 hrs ago - more...
|
2008-01-22
, 19:14
|
|
Posts: 42 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#2
|
Have you tried another player?
The built in Media Player isn't bad, but it's almost as quirky as Sony stuff...
I'm half hoping someone ports TCPMP to the NIT platform...
It was ugly but it really worked!
Either that or VLC... which is also ugly-but-works
(Would need some optimization 'tho; VLC is not particularly efficient...)
The built in Media Player isn't bad, but it's almost as quirky as Sony stuff...
I'm half hoping someone ports TCPMP to the NIT platform...
It was ugly but it really worked!
Either that or VLC... which is also ugly-but-works
(Would need some optimization 'tho; VLC is not particularly efficient...)
| The Following User Says Thank You to Cyker For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2008-01-22
, 20:28
|
|
Posts: 161 |
Thanked: 99 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#4
|
Originally Posted by Cyker
Actually for most MP4 files the built in Media Player is much better then mplayer. At least for the video podcasts I'm using with Video Center and most of which contain MP4 videos (presumably iPod/iPhone optimized) playback on the default Media Player is quite smooth, while in mplayer I'm often getting only something like 0.5 fps.
The built in Media Player isn't bad, but it's almost as quirky as Sony stuff...
On the other hand for divx mplayer seems to be the better choice.
| The Following User Says Thank You to iskarion For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2008-01-22
, 20:50
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#5
|
Originally Posted by iskarion
That would be h.264, which mplayer is very much not optimized for.
Actually for most MP4 files the built in Media Player is much better then mplayer. At least for the video podcasts I'm using with Video Center and most of which contain MP4 videos (presumably iPod/iPhone optimized) playback on the default Media Player is quite smooth, while in mplayer I'm often getting only something like 0.5 fps.
 |
|
2008-01-22
, 21:11
|
|
Posts: 34 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Erie, PA, USA
|
#6
|
The only perceivable difference between the files is the space in the filename… and outside of databases, i thought that ceased to matter 10 years ago.
__________________
Josh
Josh
|
|
2008-01-24
, 10:48
|
|
Posts: 86 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Moscow
|
#7
|
Originally Posted by Apoc112
My god..... You're right.)) But I tried to rename other files so they'd have spaces in the filename, and they are played back normally. I'll do more testing later today.
The only perceivable difference between the files is the space in the filename… and outside of databases, i thought that ceased to matter 10 years ago.
|
|
2008-01-24
, 11:21
|
|
Posts: 9 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Israel
|
#8
|
Another difference is that the one that doesn't play is 320*180, whereas the one that plays is 320*240.
Last edited by jrodin; 2008-01-24 at 11:36.
Last edited by jrodin; 2008-01-24 at 11:36.
 |
|
2008-01-24
, 11:56
|
|
Posts: 1,463 |
Thanked: 81 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ UK
|
#9
|
The built-in Media Player used to be picky about resolutions being multiples of 16, so I'd guess that's it.
I don't know if it still is, because all of my videos are either downloaded PSP/iPod ones (MP4) or DivX/Xvid-style generated through tablet-encode.
I don't know if it still is, because all of my videos are either downloaded PSP/iPod ones (MP4) or DivX/Xvid-style generated through tablet-encode.
Played normally is number 1, and doesn't play number 2.