Active Topics

 



Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#411
no, they use the same libwebkit.
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#412
hmm, when kinetic scrolling got reimplemented, did that include the ability to te it via gconf? im playing around with some settings but cant really tell any diff...
 
Saturn's Avatar
Posts: 1,648 | Thanked: 2,122 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ UNKLE's Never Never Land
#413
Maybe it was answered before and i missed it. But why hns has a different version of the libwebkit from Bandyo? or to be more exact why hns needs to disable some options?

It came to me as I've got the latest stuff from hns and through qole's repo I'm getting an update to the latest (from Bandyo).

Anyways, thank you guys (Bandyo, hns and qole) for making the experience so much better.

Last edited by Saturn; 2009-03-26 at 23:48. Reason: clarification
 
Saturn's Avatar
Posts: 1,648 | Thanked: 2,122 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ UNKLE's Never Never Land
#414
Originally Posted by tso View Post
hmm, when kinetic scrolling got reimplemented, did that include the ability to te it via gconf? im playing around with some settings but cant really tell any diff...
If i understood correctly, it is in the hns' todo list to reimplement this too.
 
Posts: 126 | Thanked: 94 times | Joined on Jun 2007 @ Berlin, Germany
#415
This seems rather cool: https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/w...il/007253.html

(Short version: An ARM-optimized version of some recent improvements to WebKit's JavaScript engine, improving performance on the NITs and other ARM devices.)

How about whipping up a libwebkit build with this? It's supposed to be fairly stable (it's passing the WebKit regression test suite, anyway).

(Meh, this is a duplicate of my earlier post to the Tear 0.3 thread. Maybe we should have a central libwebkit thread, and separate threads for its frontends.)
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sho For This Useful Post:
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#416
anyone else having interface freeze issues when eunning both this and tear at the same time lately?
 
Posts: 87 | Thanked: 98 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Austria
#417
Originally Posted by tso View Post
hmm, when kinetic scrolling got reimplemented, did that include the ability to te it via gconf? im playing around with some settings but cant really tell any diff...
Nope, but I'm planning to reimplement that for the next release. (Right, I'm planning a next release... Bundyo's recent libwebkit builds are working pretty well for me, so I guess it's time to release webkit-eal 0.11 soon)
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to hns For This Useful Post:
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#418
glad to see there is still life in this
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#419
arg, im torn. i find the eal kinetic more tolerable (maybe because i was able to tweak its treshold) but its a bit more buggy then tear at present (crashes to disfunctional microb, wrong titles on backwards longtap)...
 
Posts: 3 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Nov 2007
#420
Originally Posted by hns View Post
Nope, but I'm planning to reimplement that for the next release. (Right, I'm planning a next release... Bundyo's recent libwebkit builds are working pretty well for me, so I guess it's time to release webkit-eal 0.11 soon)
looking forward to this release ...
 
Reply

Tags
browser, webkit


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:10.