![]() |
2009-07-07
, 19:45
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#22
|
App Manager started misbehaving. The solution with reset the device or upgrade the firmware is the user will loose some (many) applications. Is this normal? Is this an ok solution?
Never seen Control Panel Add/Remove Apps to stop working and I program windows and unix for more than 16 years after my faculty graduation.
The Following User Says Thank You to fms For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-07-07
, 19:50
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#23
|
I want to know about the upgrade experience on N810. How many firmware updates did you have since N810 was released?
How is Nokia updater software for NIT?
How easy is to install/remove an application - do you have a sort of "Control Panel Add/Remove App" or like "AppManager" in Symbian?
What is the compatibility between Maemo OS versions...
The Following User Says Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-07-07
, 19:52
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#24
|
I want to know about the upgrade experience on N810. How many firmware updates did you have since N810 was released?
RX-44_2008SE_1.2007.42-18_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin RX-44_2008SE_1.2007.42-19_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin RX-44_2008SE_2.2007.50-2_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin RX-44_DIABLO_4.2008.23-14_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin RX-44_DIABLO_4.2008.36-5_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin RX-44_DIABLO_5.2008.43-7_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin
How is Nokia updater software for NIT?
How easy is to install/remove an application - do you have a sort of "Control Panel Add/Remove App" or like "AppManager" in Symbian?
What is the compatibility between Maemo OS versions because the compatibility of Symbian OS versions is simply awful?
The Following User Says Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-07-07
, 19:59
|
Posts: 362 |
Thanked: 109 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#25
|
Originally Posted by ArchitengiYes, to me it is an ok solution. Not the most preferred one, but quite tolerable.App Manager started misbehaving. The solution with reset the device or upgrade the firmware is the user will loose some (many) applications. Is this normal? Is this an ok solution?
![]() |
2009-07-07
, 20:02
|
Posts: 226 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Poland / Bialystok
|
#26
|
![]() |
2009-07-07
, 20:05
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#27
|
The Following User Says Thank You to qwerty12 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-07-07
, 20:08
|
Posts: 362 |
Thanked: 109 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#28
|
I have these in my firmware downloads directory:
Code:RX-44_2008SE_1.2007.42-18_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin RX-44_2008SE_1.2007.42-19_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin RX-44_2008SE_2.2007.50-2_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin RX-44_DIABLO_4.2008.23-14_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin RX-44_DIABLO_4.2008.36-5_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin RX-44_DIABLO_5.2008.43-7_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin
There's a Windows flashing tool but I've never used it. The command line version is documented here. You can also upgrade in-place (the so called SSU updates) which is theoretically easier but there have been problems in the past and if you upgrade by flashing the binaries are pre-linked and load faster.
Yes, it's called the Hildon Application Manager, but more importantly the underlying technology is apt, which handles dependencies and such automatically for you.
Could be better. So far every new major release meant programs had to be recompiled, and certain parts of the code (mainly UI) "ported" to the new version. Maemo 4.x to Maemo 5 is going to be a large break in compatibility, and Maemo 5 to Maemo 6 a huge one.
![]() |
2009-07-07
, 20:11
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#29
|
The Following User Says Thank You to fms For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-07-07
, 20:15
|
Posts: 362 |
Thanked: 109 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#30
|
That Control Panel is nothing special, it just runs whatever uninstaller the program had whether it be a Windows Installer one, NSIS, Inno etc. So - technically - it can't fail; being a simple program launcher.
( I prefer screen and keys on the front.)
But they are still, as you say, an ungainly compromise; e.g.:
1) Too small screen (by necessity).
2) The keys should be above the screen for more comfortable one-handed thumb typing.
What I look for is a (simple smart-) phone <> tablet combination syncronizable in both directions.
I.e.: Very pocketable one-handed + pocketable large-screen for more serious use.
I guess I will have to wait for a maturing pocket-Linux market.