![]() |
2009-08-27
, 21:16
|
|
Posts: 1,028 |
Thanked: 578 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
@ Chicago
|
#332
|
And the first rule of tool use is: always pick the right tool for the task.
I'll let you know if I ever find a task for which the right tool was Windows.
Actually they are religions: there's no other explanation people keep using windows
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 22:33
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#333
|
Chickens and eggs, John.
If the apps aren't available for the OS, then that OS is for all practical purposes useless for those dependent on said apps.
![]() |
2009-08-27
, 23:08
|
|
Posts: 1,137 |
Thanked: 402 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Catalunya
|
#334
|
![]() |
2009-08-28
, 02:29
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#335
|
Right. So, which apps that you use _only_ run on microsoft, without a just as useful and usable (or more useful and usable) and interchangeable version on Mac, BSD, Linux, and/or the Cloud?
For example, some people would say "MS Project", which itself doesn't have Mac, BSD, Linux (or Cloud that I'm aware of) versions... yet there are other project software packages that are just as good, and will read/write MS Project files. I've done entire projects where the management people above the project were all using MS Project, and the Project manager and I (if I wasn't the project manager) were using a Mac package instead. The management folks never knew the difference. So, there was no connection between "best tool" (since the tools were interchangeable) and "OS platform".
![]() |
2009-08-28
, 02:40
|
|
Posts: 332 |
Thanked: 76 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
|
#336
|
Right. So, which apps that you use _only_ run on microsoft, without a just as useful and usable (or more useful and usable) and interchangeable version on Mac, BSD, Linux, and/or the Cloud?
![]() |
2009-08-28
, 02:45
|
Posts: 397 |
Thanked: 227 times |
Joined on May 2007
|
#337
|
![]() |
2009-08-28
, 02:48
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#338
|
![]() |
2009-08-28
, 03:46
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#339
|
ArcGIS: No Mac version except for crappy java ArcExplorer. And no half-decent Linux GIS
Office suite that reads latest MS Office formats, although this should come soon.
SolidWorks
Pro/ENGINEER (although not in a while)
No native Mac versions
The tools we use in professional environments are rarely the tools we choose but rather those chosen for us.
But I'm surprised you even have to ask that question. It suggests to me a surprising lack of familiarity with the subject. This is well-covered ground... and a fruitless argument IMO.
![]() |
2009-08-28
, 03:58
|
|
Posts: 332 |
Thanked: 76 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
|
#340
|
If the apps aren't available for the OS, then that OS is for all practical purposes useless for those dependent on said apps.
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net