slender
|
2010-01-02
, 23:39
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#81
|
|
2010-01-02
, 23:43
|
Posts: 515 |
Thanked: 266 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Oelsted, Denmark
|
#82
|
Because to use email you need a dataplan. And a lot of users with pay-as-you-go sims don't have a dataplan. In fact, data on pay-as-you-go in the UK is prohibitively expensive. Remember, the phone companies charge a flat rate to send an MMS and nothing to recieve it. For email, they get to charge both sender and receiver.
On the other hand, it costs Granny nothing to recieve an MMS pic of the grandchildren. And should she ever get clever enough to want to send us a shot of herself living it up at the tea dance, it will come cheaply out of her pay-as-you-go credit without any problem.
Damn, now I miss my Granny.
|
2010-01-02
, 23:43
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#83
|
if i send 1 MMS per day that would cost me 15 euro's a month... why on earth would i spend that much money??
Yes maybe if mms would be way cheapers (5-10 times!!) then i would use it. but currently it is just a milking cow.
And is i said i dont know 1 person that uses mms.. not one..
Are they all out of sync??
|
2010-01-03
, 00:19
|
Posts: 1,427 |
Thanked: 2,077 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Sydney
|
#84
|
|
2010-01-03
, 00:22
|
Posts: 11 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#85
|
The Following User Says Thank You to svanheulen For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-03
, 00:23
|
Posts: 515 |
Thanked: 266 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Oelsted, Denmark
|
#86
|
|
2010-01-03
, 00:29
|
Posts: 589 |
Thanked: 54 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ london
|
#87
|
|
2010-01-03
, 00:42
|
|
Posts: 290 |
Thanked: 165 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#88
|
And yet, I could send 200 of them and not incur a charge. Different plans exist.
And I don't have a single person sending me e-mails with pictures taken on their cellphone. Time to either meet people halfway and drop the egocentric stances or at least be willing to admit that users are different.
Adding MMS would mean nothing to you. That's fine. You wouldn't use it. But there are more than your group that surrounds you that are considered users.
Heck, NTT Docomo's i-Mode (and other services) are partly based around being able to send photos to other phones easily. And it's a huge pull in Japan. Are they out of sync because they don't use e-mail for it?
No. They are just a different kind of user. Not all users are like you. Or like me. At least I can admit it. Can you?
|
2010-01-03
, 00:49
|
Posts: 3,401 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ London, UK
|
#89
|
And furthermore, MMS should indeed be on the N900. Just because you MMS opponents may be uber geeks, no everyone is a l33t geek like you. People are used to having MMS functionality on their phone.
|
2010-01-03
, 01:02
|
Posts: 1,427 |
Thanked: 2,077 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Sydney
|
#90
|
Someone else stated that MMS was on par (1-to-1) with SMS, yet when you consider that in 2008, worldwide, 1.3billion MMS messages were sent compared with 4.1 TRILLION SMS messages (ie. 1 MMS sent for every ~3100 SMS, or put another way MMS equates to about 0.03% of SMS traffic) it's obvious that MMS is a LOT less popular than some people are trying to make out.
I will admit that MMS serves a purpose for some people/families/groups, but they're a relatively small minority of users (based on the traffic numbers) and I would rather Nokia target their seemingly limited Maemo development resources elsewhere before getting around to adding MMS.
Tags |
kathy needs mms, mms are past tense, what is a tag |
|