|
2010-01-22
, 21:25
|
|
Posts: 2,535 |
Thanked: 6,681 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#72
|
[...] Evidently what we need is for council, or whoever, to actually make an official Document, ala FAQ, [...]
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-22
, 21:28
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#73
|
This is off-topic[1], and the reply was otherwise excellent - but there seems to be an increasing trend for people to say "the council should do this". VDVsx didn't say "the council should organise maemo.org's participation in Google Summer of Code"; he said he wanted to do it and asked if the council were aware of anyone else doing it - and, if not, could he have our blessing.
The council are supposed to facilitate the community, to try and prevent duplication etc. Not do everything!
Has anyone else noticed this, or is just me?
[1] Actually, in the scope of "the future of this community", I suppose it's on-topic.
|
2010-01-22
, 21:33
|
Posts: 220 |
Thanked: 129 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#74
|
Comparing a forum to a live neighborhood is flawed anyway. There are gated communities and other elements in real life that serve to create homogenous communities. In addition, gated communities on the internet can easily narrow membership to a select constituency.
But I was mostly musing out loud, not even remotely trying to dictate any sort of communal cleaving... and like I said I expected the "hate mail"-- especially when people choose to read superficially instead of considering content and context.
Regardless, there will come a time when this really is 2 or 3 or so distinct communities under a single umbrella. It happens. I think we should be proactive and discuss the subject, which I had thought was on topic.
The Following User Says Thank You to Gadgety For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-22
, 21:34
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#75
|
|
2010-01-22
, 21:34
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#76
|
|
2010-01-22
, 21:37
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#77
|
I was just making the comment because I myself am horrible at such things, and thus would do nobody any good if I tried to take that project on. And as you say the council facilitates, if no one else is currently working on it they could perhaps find someone willing.. that sort of thing.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-22
, 21:38
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#78
|
For me, the moral is that the current situation can be handled heroically by developers who understand how to deal with users.
This place is the only game in town. I would probably go elsewhere if there was elsewhere to go. I get upset by what seems to me the elitism of the group that came to power when maemo took the place over. But there is no other place to get usable information.
Someone buys a phone and they owe help to a community? Since when? I bought a car -- what community do I owe to because of that?
|
2010-01-22
, 21:45
|
|
Posts: 311 |
Thanked: 180 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ London
|
#79
|
Developers will not go because of a mood on a site like this. They will go because there are plenty of competing devices to the N900 out there, all of them offering better eco-system from the developer's point of view: Android, iPhone OS, BB OS all win when it comes down to the number of active devlopers as compared to Maemo. This may change over time but Nokia is not making anything to change this. My question 1: why would an iPhone developer become a Maemo developer? What are the incentives? Even if there were some, the potential install base is so low that it just won't scale. Again, maybe over time it may change, but the situation now is dare.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Haus3r For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-22
, 21:51
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#80
|
Tags |
fun is 2 doors down, i love tintin, texrat = all seeing eye, texrat = overlord, tintin for council |
|
Interesting post by Haus3r. I haven't had a good laugh in a while. Reminds me of a manager I had once who gave pep-talks like this when things were getting to stressful and people fighting with each other.
Oh, I bet ya saw me coming a mile away...
First, let's re-establish Nokia's plans that is well known (they've had to do something to calm investors down). Nokia is on record saying the N900 is setting a new direction for their smartphones. It is marketed to an entirely different group of people than previous Maemo tablets. It is the best selling N-series they have had. The first reviews hitting most any retail site were from blatantly non-technical people. Most non-tech people I know have heard of it (helps when much of the news on Nokia on CNBC and in the press in general starts with "The N900..."). However, most of the people I know, even long-time linux devs, haven't heard of the previous tablets.
So saying that most of the people who purchased it were "tech people" and it was marketed for a specialty crowd is not even close to fact. Don't take my word for it, check out Nokia's executive statements, marketing, what they've been telling their investors, press releases and etc., etc. If this is what they meant to do, didn't work out so well and the news didn't get to the CEO - he missed that memo.
Obviously, ranting doesn't speed anything up... wait, actually it does. I'd give examples, but if you think about it for a few more seconds, you will come up with 10. Assuming it doesn't in Nokia's case, then they need to use forums like other G500 companies: listen to customers, see what trends they are missing, establish patterns, change direction, supplement their market research and figure out if they are spending too much energy in the wrong areas and not enough in others. Plenty of other things to do with data like this, but you get the point. Pretty much Business 101 these days.
Seems as positive as you try to be you fail to see the positive in healthy feedback. Some might call it negative, but the successful people and companies actually see it as an opportunity to improve. Nokia has lost a lot of land in the smartphone area in just 12-months. They should look at the N900 as a way to learn what they got right and especially what they really messed up. Since Nokia's stated direction is Maemo-driven smartphones at the upper end (Symbian will live on as well, but not in higher end smartphones), they need to get on the right page to see why other manufacturers have passed them up so quickly.
I'd go on, but the bottom line is you are looking at this backwards. It's very healthy for all involved. People aren't patient and aren't going to be because you threw in a pep talk. Well, perhaps there is someone who read your post and said "wow! that is right, I need to be more patient, ignore the WONTFIXes, delayed to Harmattan which we don't know if it'll hit the N900 and just wait for the N9000 so I can spend another $700 and hopefully bluetooth works! I am so wrong for thinking I'm the customer who paid a chunk o change for this - Nokia is the one who needs ME to be patient for them to 'get around to it.' Boy was I wrong."
I do agree with some of the subsequent posts and some of what you said to the extent that folks need to be ready to embrace a different demographic than "tech people". Though, I think part of the disclaimer people sign for an iPhone now states "upon exiting the iPhone community, you'll be legally required to spend a month with Maemo" so I don't think you have to worry about those cursed people.