![]() |
2007-06-30
, 04:57
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#22
|
Who are you addressing, YoDude? Speaking of things "that would help", identifying that would be one.
If it's in reference to my posts, please read carefully. I never said Nokia was working on Java. And there are posts on this forum offering significant detail about java development efforts, including Sun's, related to the N800. Of course, as Andrew pointed out, they may or may not address the original poster's concerns. I'm really not sure what's caused the latent hostility in your post but as far as I know it's unwarranted.
If your own nebulous post had nothing to do with any of mine, kindly disregard the previous paragraph. Thanks.
EDIT: one of the posts to which I referred-- http://www.internettablettalk.com/fo...ead.php?t=6162
![]() |
2007-06-30
, 05:00
|
Posts: 125 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Aug 2006
|
#23
|
![]() |
2007-06-30
, 05:25
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#24
|
Wow!
This forum isn't about you is it?
The post you referenced says nothing about Nokia working on JAVA.
And my statement remains. "No one here can honestly say that Nokia will or will not support any particular future features."
Can you?
Nothing latent nor hostile... Just an observation.
BTW, if anyone wants clues about what will happen in the future, simply read all my previous posts for hints. I'm pretty sure that if you reassemble the letters that I have used in these posts into completely new sentences, you will find all the information.
![]() |
2007-06-30
, 05:26
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#25
|
Some people don't have the patience that we have or they have an immediate need for JVM so it still isnt the device for them today. I personally would have a 800 but I know the second I get one a n900 with a HardDrive built in and video out will be released
See, as a developer/architect, I realize the potential of the 129 N770, it is huge. The storage of the N800 helps to approach the nextstep but faulters on the lack of improvement in graphics performance. So I just put down the N800. Immediately Woot should put them on sale for $129 so I can have one to change my mind
![]() |
2007-07-02
, 00:45
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
|
#26
|
![]() |
2007-07-02
, 01:13
|
Posts: 69 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
|
#27
|
![]() |
2007-07-02
, 01:43
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#28
|
![]() |
2007-07-02
, 13:17
|
|
Posts: 218 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
@ localhost
|
#29
|
BTW, if anyone wants clues about what will happen in the future, simply read all my previous posts for hints. I'm pretty sure that if you reassemble the letters that I have used in these posts into completely new sentences, you will find all the information.
![]() |
2007-07-02
, 17:34
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
|
#30
|
If it's in reference to my posts, please read carefully. I never said Nokia was working on Java. And there are posts on this forum offering significant detail about java development efforts, including Sun's, related to the N800. Of course, as Andrew pointed out, they may or may not address the original poster's concerns. I'm really not sure what's caused the latent hostility in your post but as far as I know it's unwarranted.
If your own nebulous post had nothing to do with any of mine, kindly disregard the previous paragraph. Thanks.
EDIT: one of the posts to which I referred-- http://www.internettablettalk.com/fo...ead.php?t=6162
Last edited by Texrat; 2007-06-30 at 04:09.